‘SC, ST students merit special treatment in IITs, IIMs’
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

‘SC, ST students merit special treatment in IITs, IIMs’

Last Updated: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 20:31
Comments 19  
Tags: SCSTstudentsIITsIIMs
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the government has a constitutional duty to provide special care to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe students even in institutions of higher learning like IITs and IIMs to help them compete with general category candidates and creamy layer principle would not apply to them.

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan, Justices P Sathasivam and B S Chauhan said the creamy layer principle would not apply to SC, ST candidates and they deserved to be extended additional coaching facilities to help them successfully complete their IIT and IIM courses.

"It is not in dispute that SC and ST are separate class by themselves and the creamy layer principle is not applicable to them. Article 46 of the Constitution of India enjoins upon the state to promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation.

"These socially and economically backward categories are to be taken care of at every stage even in the specialized institutions like IITs. They must make all endeavour by providing additional coaching and bring them up at par with general category students," Justice P Sathasivam writing the judgment said.

The apex court passed the judgement while disposing off an appeal filed by six SC, ST students challenging the decision of IIT, Delhi, to expel them from the course on account of poor performance.

The apex court said the authorities at the Delhi IIT did not permit the SC, ST students to attend the special summer coaching classes and as a result the students got less marks culminating in their expulsion.

"If we analyze the credits (points) secured by these petitioners with a requirement of minimum credits in the first two years by permitting them to avail summer course and by conducting extra/additional coaching or training including in English subject, it would be possible for them to cross the minimum required credits to attend third year and so on", it said.

Avinash Singh Bagri and five others had moved the apex court complaining that most of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe students, who have been given admission in IIT, Delhi, are being denied the right to pursue their studies by the institution on the ground of poor performance and such students are being expelled and their admissions cancelled after one year or two years.

"Though the first respondent (Registrar IIT Delhi) has specifically denied that there is any discrimination on the basis of caste or any complaint was made to the appropriate authority, the fact remains that additional/extra efforts were not fully afforded to these students in order to compete with the general category students and also secure the minimum required credits in first and second year,” the apex court said.

Hence it directed the IIT, Delhi, management to consider afresh the cases of the students in accordance with the rules.

According to the criteria fixed by IIT Delhi, a student in general category must secure at least 20 credits and a student in SC/ST/OBC category must secure at least 16 credits at the end of the 2nd semester, failing which his/her registration would be terminated.

In the second year, a student in general category must secure at least 50 credits while SC/ST/OBC category student must secure 46 credits at the end of 4th semester, failing which his/her registration would be terminated. A student’s registration may be terminated at the end of the 3rd year, 4th year or 5th year if he/she fails to earn at least 84, 120 or 156 credits respectively.

The petitioners had contended that in spite of providing reservation in higher education like medical and engineering streams, no coaching or any other facilities are provided to SC/ST/OBC candidates to enable them to compete with other general category students, as a result of which, more than 90 per cent of SC/ST/OBC students drop out from these courses in first year or second year.

As a result, reserved seats in higher courses are lying vacant and unfilled, they said. In the year 2008, about 85 per cent reserved seats remained unfilled in IITs. For the last ten years, in the courses at IITs, about 90 per cent of SC/ST/OBC students are either dropped or were declared as "failed" in the first year or in the second year, they said.

"The reservation made by the central government/state governments becomes redundant as no infrastructure is provided to SC/ST/OBC candidates to enable them to acquire bench marks," the petitioners' counsel D K Garg argued in the court.

Bureau Report

First Published: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 20:31

Comments

Miss Kunda Kerkar - Panaji - Goa
Sir, I the undersigned Miss Kunda Kerkar, working in the Goa Legislature Secretariat, I have ed on the resevered category of SC. I have joined in 1/12/1999, after that the Legislative Department is ed me for promotion on 18/9/2007 on vacant post of General Category, after that I have also got confirmed order and seniority list. One of the Staff namely Shri Ramchandra Paleyekar, Jr. Assistant ed to the post for OBC reserved category in 2002 on merit list. Now the problem is that I was ed for the post of Assistant for General Category so, the Shri Palekar has informed to NCST, Bhopal regargding the the 9th point and the DPC meeting held and the decision has given in the Office that Miss Kunda Kerkar should be reverted back as Jr. Assistant in the Goa Legislature Secretariat. Sir, the Office Goa Legislature Secretariat has issued me order of reversion on 19/7/2011 and they same post which I was promoted in the 2007 the office has promoted to the Shri Ramchandra Palekar as Assistant w.e.f. 18/9/2007. Sir please help in this matter and reply me on me Email address i.e. kundakerkar@yahoo.com
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
kunda kerkar - panaji -Goa
Reply of the above mentioned message
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Vinoth Kumar - Hyderabad
sc/st students are given fees concessions. in a class the teacher is same. if we compare the standards of a general category student and an sc/st student, the general student(most often) is better than that of the other. what is the use of waiving the fees for these students? if something is obtained easily, one won`t realize its importance.

these people say ``all are equal``. if all are equal, why the hell the reservations come into picture? it is the individual student who has to take measures to raise his/her standard. unless there is self drive, all the plans made by government is useless. reservations are just cheating business. good and bright candidates are losing opportunites because of it.



Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Sukh Pal Dhingan - New Delhi
general category people are foreigners/aryans looted our country and now enjoying 100 percent reservation of our country`s air conditioned kothi/bang low/houses, having big fields/land/farms, enjoying temples offerings in billions of rupees and feeling proud of their higher caste tag. why they are not claiming 100 percent reservation in sweepers job?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Praveen - New Delhi
The problem is not the reservation but the attitude and social mentality developed through generations. Whenever an sc/st officer posted on higher seat, the subordinates attitude always changed and most of the time taken as granted. Similarly in education also whenever any student coming from sc/st category, the faculty and other students most of the time look from hatred attitude though they don`t say in the words but show through gesture. The classic example was Venu Gopal, AIIMS who and his other faculty members made utmost attempt to create problems to sc/st students as revenge to minister A. Ramdoss. Even if you look into judicial decisions, 99% decision gone against the sc/st, whether vacancy based roster, relaxation in passing marks, Darbhanga eyes massacre, panwari kand or any other social atrocity against sc/st. The classic example was one Allahabad High Court Judge had performed purification of his bungalow before shifting because earlier judge was sc.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
thinakar - tamilnadu
reservations are not only given for sc\st . they are given to obc s. most of the higher caste idiots give obstacles in various forms even if the scheduled caste persons comes up good in life.these obstacles will only know only if they are scand st.change your community like sc and go to any non sc poltician and ask them for an mla seat in unreserved legislative assembly seat. try idiots.these should be done for one day.then u people know how we are tackling
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vivek - mumbai
am not getting it and it`s really beyond my reach that people from singapore, texas, and THE UNITED STATES, those who prefer to leave INDIA for few dollars are now all of a sudden worried about INDIA and it`s judiciary and it`s parliament. If INDIA could do without your services and your brains and your tax then may be INDIAN doesn`t need your concern. Rest all are welcome for a 1-2-1 deabte but mind it only with sound facts and logics. I call people to debate me those who knows why Karna was not allowed to fight Arjun in Rangbhoomi and marry Draupadi. jai ma bharati
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vikas - mumbai
there were 5000 seats in my time (2004). 3 lakhs students wrote the exam and 5000 got through. 295,000 didn`t. now after 22.5% reservation say there are only 3800 students would get through from general category instead of 295,000 students, 296,200 would fail. what`s the big deal. the best 3800 would get a place and if someone who comes from a socially strong background is not competent enough to score a place in that 3800 why should we worry about them. We`d worry about those who 1200 come from a socially oppressed background instead of those 1200 who come from a healthy background. What`s the dilemma. what`s unfair here.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vika - mumbai
its unfortunate that even dr. and iitians are throwing darts on boards without knowing the facts, i dont see if there is any point in being an IITian if you prefer not to go through what you are talkin` about and just being misled by media. making comments on a verdict passed by the apex court without knowing the case is nothing but pure ignorance. I`d request all of you to go through the verdict of WP(C) NO.535/2008 point 7,15,18,20,22,23,24,27. MR. Gaurav which IIT did you graduate from i`m sure not IIT D. we ain`t talkin about prep course here. SC asked IIT D for extra coaching and reconsider the expulsion. If you people don`t have time to go through that verdict then i assume it`d not be smart of you wasting your time here in scribbling unnecessary things `cause court or parliament is not waiting for you here.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
nitin - pune
supreme court land mark judgement on for sc /st students in iits realiy iits directors do not want to study in iits iits throughing out sc /st students and govt just sleeping
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Dr. Gopinath - Dammam
SC/ST, etc should be given free education and hostel facilities but MUST compete academically on equal footing with others , or else we run the risk of churning out sub standard doctors and engineers. So much hue and cry is be made over Donation Colleges where money takes the place of merit. The same principle should apply here too.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Sukh Pal Dhingan - New Delhi
general category people are foreigners/aryans looted our country and now enjoying 100 percent reservation of our country`s air conditioned kothi/bang low/houses, having big fields/land/farms, enjoying temples offerings in billions of rupees and feeling proud of their higher caste tag. why they are not claiming 100 percent reservation in sweepers job?



thinakar - tamilnadu
reservations are not only given for sc\st . they are given to obc s. most of the higher caste idiots give obstacles in various forms even if the scheduled caste persons comes up good in life.these obstacles will only know only if they are scand st.change your community like sc and go to any non sc poltician and ask them for an mla seat in unreserved legislative assembly seat. try idiots.these should be done for one day.then u people know how we are tackling



vikas - mumbai
there were 5000 seats in my time (2004). 3 lakhs students wrote the exam and 5000 got through. 295,000 didn`t. now after 22.5% reservation say there are only 3800 students would get through from general category instead of 295,000 students, 296,200 would fail. what`s the big deal. the best 3800 would get a place and if someone who comes from a socially strong background is not competent enough to score a place in that 3800 why should we worry about them. We`d worry about those who 1200 come from a socially oppressed background instead of those 1200 who come from a healthy background. What`s the dilemma. what`s unfair here.