UN passes NPT resolution, India says no
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

UN passes NPT resolution, India says no

Last Updated: Friday, September 25, 2009, 00:47
Comments 2  
UN passes NPT resolution, India says no Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: India refused to abide by the UN Security Council resolution asking all non-NPT nations to sign the pact, saying it cannot accept the "externally prescribed norms or standards" on issues that are contrary to its national interests or infringe on its sovereignty.

India maintained that it cannot join the NPT as a non-weapon country even as it reiterated its commitment to no testing and no-first-use besides non-discriminatory universal non-proliferation.

In a letter to UN Security Council President Susan E Rice, India's Permament Representative to the UN Hardeep Singh Puri has said "India cannot accept calls for universalization of the NPT."

The development came as the UN Security Council unanimously passed a resolution asking all countries which have not signed the Non Proliferation Treaty to sign the agreement.

Citing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's statement in Parliament on July 29, Puri said "there is no question of India joining the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state. Nuclear weapons are an integral part of India’s national security and will remain so, pending non-discriminatory and global nuclear disarmament."

He said India "cannot accept externally prescribed norms or standards on matters within the jurisdiction of its Parliament or which are not consistent with India’s constitutional provisions and procedures, or are contrary to India’s national interests or infringe on its sovereignty."

Puri contended India cannot comply with non-proliferation obligations to which it has not provided its consent.

The UN Security Council which unanimously adopted the resolution asking all non-NPT states to join the treaty at an unprecedented summit was chaired by President Barack Obama who signalled that these countries which included India must come on board.

The 15-member Council while urging "other states" outside the NPT to join the controversial treaty as non-nuclear states to help rid the world of atom bombs also urged all countries to sign and ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and refrain from conducting atomic tests. India has not signed the CTBT yet.

The 'other states' which were not named in the landmark resolution were a clear reference to Pakistan and India, which have not signed the NPT but are known to have atomic arsenals, and Israel, which neither confirms nor denies having nuclear arms but is believed to have a sizeable stockpile of warheads.

The resolution also calls for talks on drafting a treaty to ban the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons.

The mandate of the Council came when it approved the resolution 1887 which calls on countries that have not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) "to comply fully with all their obligations."

Obama said the resolution will strengthen the NPT. "We have made it clear that the Security Council has both the authority and responsibility to respond to violations of this treaty," he said.

"Nations with nuclear weapons have the responsibility to move towards disarmament and those without them have the responsibility to forsake them," Obama said.

The resolution declareD that the NPT remains the cornerstone of the nuclear non-proliferation regime.

Questioning the locus standi of the Security Council in the enforcing of NPT, the Indian envoy to the UN said the role of the world body "would arise if those treaties (like the NPT) themselves provide for such a role."

"We cannot accept any obligations arising from treaties that India has not signed or ratified. This position is consistent with the fundamental principles of international law and the Law of Treaties," Puri said in the letter dated yesterday which was released here today.

India, which has been maintaining that NPT is discriminatory and flawed, pointed out that it had in 1992 prescribed norms and standards for national or international conduct which the Security Council itself "must scrupulously accept".

Underlining its commitment to universal disarmament and non-proliferation, Puri said "it is clear that the international community would look to the countries with substantial nuclear arsenals represented on the Council for meaningful steps towards nuclear disarmament."

The Indian envoy said "working towards our common objectives would require a steadfast commitment to genuine multilateralism to ensure viable and enduring solutions to global peace and security".

"A more representative Security Council would add credibility and vitality to such efforts," he said adding India is committed to working with the international community to "advance our common non-proliferation and disarmament objectives so that we are able to fulfill the vision of a world free of nuclear weapons."

The resolution calls for stepped up efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, promote disarmament and "reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism.

It was only the fifth time the Security Council met at summit level since the U.N. was founded in 1945. And Obama was the first American president to preside over a Security Council summit, gaveling the meeting into session and announcing that "the draft resolution has been adopted unanimously."

Obama also made a reference to the apparent delay by the US Senate to ratify the CTBT.

"We will move forward with the ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and open the door to deeper cuts in our own nuclear arsenals," he said.

"In America I promise that we will pursue a new agreement with Russia to substantially reduce our strategic war heads and launches," the US President said.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hailed the summit leaders for the resolution saying "This is a historic moment, a moment offering a fresh start toward a new future."

"Although we averted a nuclear nightmare during the Cold War, we now face proliferation of a scope and complexity that demands new strategies and new approaches," Obama told the Summit.

"Just one nuclear weapon exploded in a city, be it New York or Moscow, Tokyo or Beijing, London or Paris, could kill hundreds of thousands of people," the President said.

The Security Council endorsed an effort to lock down all vulnerable nuclear materials within four years.

The Council also reaffirmed "their obligations in relations to arms control and disarmament and to prevent proliferation in all its aspects of all weapons of mass destruction."



First Published: Friday, September 25, 2009, 00:47

Comments

Jerrey - USA
as an american citizen i can understand your statement..and as a jew i think isreal should take steps with us aid to see that iran never has nucleur weapons as well.....haven`t we learned yet!!!!!!!!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
PP TALWAR - India
It is pathetic that India being a resposible, soverign sate having a clean track record of not indulging in any arms race or stockpiling nuclear weapons clandestinely, is now being pessurised by the UN to sign NPT and CTBT. Being surounded by China and Pakistan, both armed to the teeth with the nuclear weapons and having a solid back-up nuclear military arsnel, under no circumstances India can afford to sign NPT and CTBT. As a peace loving nation, on its part, India has already declared ``no first use of nuclear weapons and agreed to inspections by the UN experts of its nuclear energy generation plants.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments