USIBC applauds conclusion of US-India reprocessing accord
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

USIBC applauds conclusion of US-India reprocessing accord

Last Updated: Monday, March 29, 2010, 22:35
Comments 0  
Washington: Terming it as a significant step forward for Indo-US commercial nuclear cooperation, a top bilateral business body today applauded the conclusion of the agreement to grant India advance consent to reprocess spent fuel of US origin and fuel burned in US reactors.

"The agreement to make India the third reprocessing partner of the US reflects the special trust and respect that exists between strategic partners," said Ron Somers, president the US India Business Council.

"Today's announcement attests to continuity and bipartisanship in both countries, and encourages us that US-India civil nuclear trade is near at hand," he said.

The advanced consent agreement is just the third such pact ever undertaken by the US with another country.

The US had previously granted similar rights only to the European consortium EURATOM and Japan, but not to China, Brazil, Indonesia, South Korea, nor to sixteen other countries with 123 Agreements.

Finalisation of the reprocessing agreement fulfills an important provision of the US-India 123 Agreement, which prescribed deadlines for negotiation of the separate reprocessing pact.

Under the 123 Agreement, India will construct new facilities dedicated for reprocessing the safeguarded nuclear material under IAEA safeguards.

USIBC, supported by the leading US commercial nuclear suppliers, was instrumental in advocating that the 123 Agreement include advanced consent rights.

Since final congressional approval of the 123 Agreement in October 2008, USIBC has steadfastly promoted commercial implementation of the historic accord.

"Resolution of two key issues will enable India to assume a key role in the global commercial nuclear supply chain," said Ted Jones, director for policy advocacy at USIBC.

"We hope these issues will get early attention, as US and Indian commercial nuclear firms are eager to partner not just in India, but in the renaissance of commercial nuclear power around the world."

The first issue is agreement by the US and Indian governments on non-proliferation assurances to permit US licensing for technical exchanges regarding nuclear power.

Delays in these "Part 810 assurances", as they are known, are currently preventing work by Indian suppliers in the US as well as collaboration in India, USIBC noted.

The second issue is India's adoption of a regime to make nuclear liability predictable, consistent with the IAEA-sponsored Convention on Supplementary Compensation, USIBC said.

"A nuclear liability law will not just establish an effective and assured means for adequate compensation in the extremely unlikely event of an accident. It will also enable responsible national and international suppliers to develop the safest nuclear power programme in India. Contrary to myth, suppliers from all countries will require a modern nuclear liability regime in order to participate in the Indian market," USIBC said.

It urged New Delhi to do its part in terms of quick passage of the civilian nuclear liability bill by the Indian Parliament

Observing that US commercial nuclear companies have much to offer India as it undertakes an ambitious plan to add 60,000 MW in commercial generating capacity by 2030, USIBC said the American commercial nuclear industry leads the world in size, performance, innovation, and engineering.

"The US is by a wide margin the largest generator of nuclear electric power in the world - with 27 per cent of the world's total installed capacity and nearly double the number of reactors as France.

"The US also produces at roughly 1/2 to 1/3 of the cost in other major countries. In recent decades, US reactor companies and civil nuclear engineering companies have remained at the forefront of innovation and engineering worldwide," it said.

PTI

First Published: Monday, March 29, 2010, 22:35

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments