Age row: Army Chief withdraws petition
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

Age row: Army Chief withdraws petition

Last Updated: Friday, February 10, 2012, 16:40
Comments 25  
Age row: Army Chief withdraws petition Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday disposed off Army Chief General VK Singh’s petition which had sought to restore his date of birth as May 10, 1951 and not May 10, 1950 as accepted by the Defence Ministry.

The petition was disposed off after Gen Singh’s counsel, senior advocate UU Lalit, withdrew the petition, stating that his client didn’t want to prolong the matter any further.

The Army Chief was left with no option after the court asked him to either take back his petition or else it will rule on the matter.

The apex court had also made it clear that there was no scope for it to interfere in the matter.

The SC bench comprising justices RM Lodha and HL Gokhale had listed out the options while stating that Gen Singh’s date of birth recorded with the UPSC, which is May 10, 1950, was final.

The Army Chief was not present in the court during the hearing today.

Earlier, in its observations the apex court had said that recognition of Gen Singh's date of birth as May 10, 1950 by Army does not suffer from perversity and is not grossly erroneous.

The SC further said Gen Singh has to abide by his commitment and honour his letters of 2008 and 2009 accepting the date of birth as May 10, 1950.

No prejudice was done to Gen Singh and the government has full faith in him, the bench stated.

Attorney General GE Vahanvati also told the court that the government and 'raksha mantri' has full faith and confidence in Gen Singh to lead the Army.

The court said Gen Singh's writ petition was not for determination of date of birth but for recognition of date of birth in official records.

Looking into constraint of judicial review, the decision of government on his date of birth will continue to be there, the court stated.

The SC told Gen Singh that having given his commitment and assurance of abiding by the government decision, he cannot resile.

We want to ensure that Gen Singh continues to work as Army Chief as he has been doing, the bench added.

‘UPSC record final’

The SC had sought to know from the counsel appearing for Gen Singh that as to why he didn’t get his date of birth corrected with the UPSC which had recorded it as May 10, 1950.

All documents at threshold when Gen Singh joined IMA, NDA recorded his date of birth as May 10, 1950, the bench observed.

"The documents at the threshold when you wanted to join IMA, NDA contains the date of birth as May 10, 1950. In all documents at the threshold your date of birth is recorded as May 10, 1950," it noted.

The court also said that the primary record for Gen Singh's date of birth was with UPSC which never corrected it.

"If they (UPSC) don't do what do you do," the bench asked the counsel.

While stating the court doesn’t doubt his honesty, the bench maintained that’s not material to the court.

Govt withdraws Dec 30 order

Earlier in the day, the government informed the Supreme Court that it was withdrawing its December 30, 2011 order rejecting Gen Singh’s statutory complaint for treating his date of birth as May 10, 1951 instead of May 10, 1950.

The Attorney General informed the Supreme Court about the government's decision when the court resumed hearing on the age row this morning.

The development came a week after the SC pulled up the government during the last hearing, saying the December 30, 2011 order "appears to be vitiated". The court had told the government that the order would be quashed if it was not withdrawn.

The AG however told the SC that the government's July 21 and 22 order turning down Gen Singh's plea on age row stands.

During the hearing, Solicitor General Rohinton Nariman cited three letters of Gen Singh to say that he has been unequivocally given his personal rights.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today said it would not be proper for him to comment on the matter as it is before the court.

While Gen Singh maintained that his date of birth is May 10, 1951, the Defence Ministry had insisted that it should be treated as May 10, 1950.

Gen Singh had earlier this week submitted before the Supreme Court additional documents to support his case for restoring his date of birth as May 10, 1951. The documents relate to the Army Rules on Commissioning of officers.

Gen Singh had moved the apex court in January this year accusing the government of treating him in a manner reflecting total lack of adherence to procedure and principles of natural justice in deciding his age.

The Army Chief took the unprecedented step of dragging the government to the apex court after the Defence Ministry had insisted upon treating May 10, 1950 as his official date of birth, necessitating his retirement on May 31 this year.

Challenging the government's decision to determine May 10, 1950 as his date of birth, Gen Singh, in a 68-page petition, maintained that his acceptance of 1950 as the year of his birth was given in good faith at the behest of the then chief of Army Staff and not due to agreement with the conclusion of the Military Secretary's Branch.

First Published: Friday, February 10, 2012, 09:14

Comments

oktata.com - Delhi
From Nursery to Retirement: An Age Old Dispute
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
NP Singh - Canada
We hail the Supreme Court decision.In our opinion the GENERAL THOUGHT HE COULD MISLEAD THE SUPREME COURT. But the docile government remained very firm and won hands down. He would repent all of his rest of life for dragging the Govt. unnecessarily to the SC.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
aryan - chandigarh
According to me ,its shame for the country.When Army Chief stood for what he was right.He should have gone to the end with it.In the end , he might have lost or won the case.India has full faith in General Singh, but our honour is shattered as today,Army Chief took his step back.Be a man, Sir.If you would have lost your job on this.Why crumbling to pressure!It is altogether mistake of ministry if your date of birth was not made correct.We Indians always keep Army as our Pride and your step back on a issue which challenges corrupt system in India has shattered our hopes of Good Governance in future.You was and will be BEST ARMY CHIEF we had till date for your strong observations regarding security of India against China and Pak.PRIDE AND HONOUR FIRST.Where is it gone.Sir, Please resign!JAI HIND. You will still be best!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
omprakash - hyderabad
remarkable judgment.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
rsngh_1949 - chandigarh
Truth can not be suoressed so easily when the case is with the highest court of the country.General Sing was totally misguided by certain vested interest in raking up the un necessay issue after 42 years,violating all his pledges,Memoranda of 54,67 & the relevent army instruction which make it binding on service officers to sort out any discrepancy of age with in 2 years of service.True soldiers of Indian army got the worst shock,when chief on a personal issue went to the court against his own Govt which made hims chief from Lt to 4 star General.Saffronised elements & vested media propagandist were at its ugly best in suppressing the truth & campaigned/sided with the chief by projecting age row as an issue of honor & integrity & morale of Indian army.Many media propagandist put Gobal`s soul to shame with their baseless Lies.He is honest & good soldier but on age row he damaged his soldiering reputation.Brave people digest ego in larger interest of organization & country.General Singh should continue till 31 May 2012.Govt will be & should use his talent while forming /taking vital security related decisions.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
surinder pal bhaskar - new delhi
It was wrong on the part of Gen. v.k.singh to drag the govt. in supreme court. The issue of dob. lack merit in it. He himself has put his respect and integrity at stake. It is big insult to the institution. Mr. singh deserve this situation and is alesson for him. He does not deserve any sympathy and lost his decency.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
BRAJESH KUMAR - NEW DELHI
THIS IS A WAY OUT, NOT DECISION.. WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER HAD GEN. SINGH PRAYED THE HON. COURT TO DETERMINE HIS D.O.B. IN MY OPINION, IT WAS AN ERROR WHICH WARRANTED CORRECTION AND STREAMLINING OF RECORDS.... WHAT CAN I DO IF GEN. SINGH HAS CHOSEN TO GIVE UP.... I M NOT SATISFIED...
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
RAGHAVENDRA R PAWAR - BANGALORE
Government can breathe after this verdict as it recived blow after blow from apex court regard 2G scam and other issues. In the history of independent India fist military chief to step into judiciary over a matter and after that lot of for and against criticism and comments appeared but government stick to its stand without hurting General honor and prestige. Finally court verdict vindicated government stand and given some relief to its court battlings still left in other major issues like 2G.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
R A K E S H K A P U R - A M R I T S A R
THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT HANDLED PROPERLY THE MATTER PERTAINING TO THE AGE ROW OF THE ARMY CHIEF AS IT HAS NOT SOUNDED WELL IN THE ARMY CIRCLES. IT WILL BE IN THE INTEREST OF THE NATION THAT THE GOVERNMENT SOOTHE THE HURT FEELINGS OF THE GENERAL AND MAY GIVE HIM A SUITABLE ASSIGMENT AS PER HIS CHOICE AFTER HIS RETIREMENT.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sree kumar - dammam, saudi arabia
WITH DUE RESPECTS TO SC., THE DECISION IS MOST WELCOMED BY ALL
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

BRAJESH KUMAR - NEW DELHI
THIS IS A WAY OUT, NOT DECISION.. WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER HAD GEN. SINGH PRAYED THE HON. COURT TO DETERMINE HIS D.O.B. IN MY OPINION, IT WAS AN ERROR WHICH WARRANTED CORRECTION AND STREAMLINING OF RECORDS.... WHAT CAN I DO IF GEN. SINGH HAS CHOSEN TO GIVE UP.... I M NOT SATISFIED...



Robine Singh - Patiala
age dispute of any govt official shud not be publically as whatever pertaining to their age makes available in records by themselves not by others



SAIKUMAR T - HYDERABAD
WHY ARE RISE THAT MUCH ISSUES ,IT IS VERY SENSITIVE ISSUE .