Afghan forces, not US, key to success: US Senator

Last Updated: Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:31

Washington: The leading Senate Democrat on military matters said on Sunday that President Barack Obama`s anticipated plan for significantly expanding US troop levels in Afghanistan must show how those reinforcements will help increase the size of the Afghan security forces.
Senator Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said more Afghan Army and police are central to succeeding in the eight-year-old war and more US trainers and equipment can help meet that goal. But it`s unclear, Levin said, what role tens of thousands additional combat troops will play, and Obama has to make a compelling case during a national address he`s scheduled to give Tuesday night from the US Military Academy at West Point, NY.

"The key here is an Afghan surge, not an American surge," said Levin, D-Mich "We cannot, by ourselves, win (the) war."

Levin`s remarks are a preview of the possible roadblocks Obama faces from his own party as he prepares to sell a broader, more expensive battle plan for Afghanistan to an American public weary of the conflict that began just weeks after the September 11, 2001, attacks.

At West Point, Obama is expected to announce an increase of up to 35,000 more US forces to defeat the Taliban-led insurgency and stabilize a weak Afghan government. The escalation, which would take place over the next year, would put more than 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan at an annual cost of about USD 75 billion. Obama is also expected to outline his exit strategy.

Democrats concerned over the price tag have proposed a war tax to pay for operations. Rep David Obey, D-Wis, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has introduced legislation to impose a war surtax beginning in 2011. The bill would exempt service members and their families.

"If this war is important enough to engage in the long term, it`s important enough to pay for," Obey said.

Lawmakers want a greater commitment from NATO allies so the US isn`t footing the bill on its own.

"I`ve got a real problem about expanding this war where the rest of the world is sitting around and saying, `Isn`t it a nice thing that the taxpayers of the United States and the US military are doing the work that the rest of the world should be doing?`" said Sen Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said several allied nations will offer a total of 5,000 more troops. But speaking on Saturday at a news conference in the Caribbean nation of Trinidad, Brown also said Afghan President Hamid Karzai`s government must meet specific benchmarks that allow foreign troops to gradually hand over control of the fighting to local forces.

Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana, the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said he was wary of strict benchmarks that put both sides in an untenable situation if they`re not met. But he said an early test of success will be whether Afghan forces can hold onto southern parts of the country after the US and NATO succeed in chasing out the Taliban.

Bureau Report



First Published: Monday, November 30, 2009 - 10:31

More from zeenews

 
comments powered by Disqus