More experiments needed to confirm CERN`s finding
Zeenews
       English        
Wednesday, May 30, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Space

More experiments needed to confirm CERN's finding

Last Updated: Friday, October 14, 2011, 09:39
Comments 9  
More experiments needed to confirm CERN`s finding Hyderabad: More experimentation is needed on nuclear particle Neutrino to verify if its speed can exceed that of light, a leading scientist said today.

Findings by European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) on neutrinos show that the particle can exceed the speed of light, thus debunking Einstein's Theory of Relativity, the bedrock of Physics for more than a century.

New experiments by CERN have revealed that the theory may have to be reviewed and modified.

Birla Science Centre Director Siddharth said the scientific community was waiting for new experimentation to be carried out, as a similar result observed in 2007 in the USA was later dismissed as "erroneous". Scientists are now performing the experiment again and Fermi National Laboratory in Chicago is working on this, he said.

"Why the findings of CERN result may be correct after all is because of my own theoretical work for more than a decade has shown that Einstein's theory would require modification," he said.

He said that if the theory about existence of faster than light particles is proved correct, then it would have many implications for Physics.

"It would mean that the energy we get from nuclear reactor would be enhanced and existing models of particles will have to be changed," he said.

PTI

First Published: Friday, October 14, 2011, 09:39

Comments

prakash masih k. lall - Lucknow, India
Dear physicist and scientists, in CERN experiment, you may not find any thing new until and unless you see the state of matter the other way round i.e. what you perceive as solid [say like Proton or Neutron] is absolute void and what you perceive as total void [say like intergalactic space] as real solid. I have proofs to make my point. pklall
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
prakash masih k. lall - Lucknow, India
Don’t be misled by the speed of Neutrino to be faster than the speed of light. Intergalactic space is not void. It is filled with non-atomic matter that restricts the speed of light.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
prashanth - bangalore
which means we can make more powerful nuclear bombs. God save the world ! Why bother God never intended to save the world, he wants us to suffer, it makes him relax :)
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
prashanth - bangalore
which means we can make more powerful nuclear bombs.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Hasmukh K. Tank - Ahmedabad
In my opinion, there is a difference between `wave` and `particle` of photons and all other particles including neutrino. Waves travel at a given speed in a given medium. whereas `particle` is a bundle of a very wide band of waves. This wideband of waves, when get added constructively, gives rise to a `particle`. So we generally find `particles` travelling at `group-velocity` and `waves` travelling at their speed in a given medium. If neutrinos are really travelling at a speed faster than light, then they may be the constructive-superimpositions of waves traveling at the `phase-velocity`.That is, constructive-superimposition of a bundel of waves all travelling at `phase-velocity`.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jim Burrill - California
The OPERA results and Einstein`s relativity can both be correct as long as the definition of ``c`` is re-evaluated. When light travels through air or water it travels slower than ``c``. So to measure ``c``, the speed of light was measured ``in a vacuum``. Why, until now, hasn`t anyone said ``Wait a minute, according to quantum mechanics, there`s no such thing as a vacuum, so that measurement must really be slower than `c```?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jim Burrill - California
The OPERA results and Einstein`s relativity can both be correct as long as the definition of ``c`` is re-evaluated. When light travels through air or water it travels slower than ``c``. So to measure ``c``, the speed of light was measured ``in a vacuum``. Why, until now, hasn`t anyone said ``Wait a minute, according to quantum mechanics, there`s no such thing as a vacuum, so that measurement must really be slower than `c```?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
abhi - bangalore
It would mean that the energy we get from nuclear reactor would be enhanced and existing models of particles will have to be changed
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
kalpesh - INDIA-Maharashtra
Would please send me the information after if the expriment will be successful . I think that it would be right if so then by using this technology we can travel in space at much speed .So we can get more information.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Hasmukh K. Tank - Ahmedabad
In my opinion, there is a difference between `wave` and `particle` of photons and all other particles including neutrino. Waves travel at a given speed in a given medium. whereas `particle` is a bundle of a very wide band of waves. This wideband of waves, when get added constructively, gives rise to a `particle`. So we generally find `particles` travelling at `group-velocity` and `waves` travelling at their speed in a given medium. If neutrinos are really travelling at a speed faster than light, then they may be the constructive-superimpositions of waves traveling at the `phase-velocity`.That is, constructive-superimposition of a bundel of waves all travelling at `phase-velocity`.



Jim Burrill - California
The OPERA results and Einstein`s relativity can both be correct as long as the definition of ``c`` is re-evaluated. When light travels through air or water it travels slower than ``c``. So to measure ``c``, the speed of light was measured ``in a vacuum``. Why, until now, hasn`t anyone said ``Wait a minute, according to quantum mechanics, there`s no such thing as a vacuum, so that measurement must really be slower than `c```?



Jim Burrill - California
The OPERA results and Einstein`s relativity can both be correct as long as the definition of ``c`` is re-evaluated. When light travels through air or water it travels slower than ``c``. So to measure ``c``, the speed of light was measured ``in a vacuum``. Why, until now, hasn`t anyone said ``Wait a minute, according to quantum mechanics, there`s no such thing as a vacuum, so that measurement must really be slower than `c```?