Alld HC directs UP DGP to mention age accused in FIRs
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, February 11, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Uttar Pradesh

Alld HC directs UP DGP to mention age accused in FIRs

Last Updated: Monday, December 07, 2009, 23:18
Views 471 Comments 0  
Lucknow: The Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court on Monday directed the Director General Of Police, UP to ensure that all FIRs registered in police stations throughout the state should specifically mention the age of the accused.

Issuing these directives, while hearing a case relating to the arrest of a youth in Mohanlalganj area of Lucknow, the division bench comprising Justice Umanath Singh and Justice SNH Zaidi said, "We noticed that in the FIR there is no mention of the age of the alleged detenue, despite several oral directions to the state counsel that if a specific column has been provided for that, the same should be mentioned in the affidavit."

The court provided 10 days time to the state counsel to file supplementary affidavit and directed to list the matter thereafter.

A division bench was hearing a habeas corpus petition filed through telegram sent by one Mithelesh Soni, seeking safety of her son Sunny alias Ashish from the police.

It was alleged in the telegram that on October 10, 2009, Mohanlalganj (Lucknow) police had taken her son away at 6 PM.

This telegram was sent to the senior Judge High Court Lucknow Bench, which was produced before the aforesaid division bench in the form of habeas corpus petition.

DIG/SSP Lucknow Prem Prakash, in his affidavit (reply) said that the accused had been arrested in bonafide exercise of power on October 12, 2009 on account of recovery of a countrymade pistol of 315 bore and one cartridge of the same description, while the telegram was sent on October 11, 2009.

The court however said that it was not prima facie convinced of the DIG's contention that the accused had been arrested in bonafide exercise of power, as the telegram is dated October 11, 2009, whereas accused has been shown to have been arrested on October 12, 2009.

PTI

First Published: Monday, December 07, 2009, 23:18

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments