Uphaar: Court refers CBI report to senior most district judge
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, February 11, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Delhi

Uphaar: Court refers CBI report to senior most district judge

Last Updated: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 21:01
Views 429 Comments 0  
New Delhi: A Delhi court on Saturday again refused to decide a legal question whether it is empowered to take congizance of CBI's probe report giving a clean chit to former IPS officer Amod Kanth in 1997 Uphaar fire case and referred the matter to the senior most district judge.

District and Sessions Judge S P Garg, to whom the matter was referred back for taking a decision, said that he would not decide on the issue.

"I am sending the case to G P Mittal, the senior most District and Sessions Judge at Tis Hazari," Garg said.

The case was referred to Garg on February 18 by another District Judge Gurdeep Kumar.

The courts are refusing to decide the issue of whether a sessions judge can take cognizance of the report or not.

According to the CrPC, metropolitan magistrates are empowered to take cognizance of a chargesheet or report before sending the case to a sessions court for start of the trial.

So far, two district judges -- S P Garg and Gurdeep Kumar -- have refused to decide the question as to whether they were empowered to take cognizance of the CBI's probe report, giving clean chit to Kanth in the Uphaar fire case.

Now, the matter would be heard afresh by District Judge G P Mittal on February 25, the next date of hearing.

CBI, in pursuance of a Delhi High Court order, had filed a report after probing the role of Kanth, the then Delhi DCP who was accused of allowing an increase in the number of seats in the balcony of the ill-fated theatre.

CBI favoured non-prosecution of Kanth saying he did not commit any offence and acted as per the technical advice.

There was no witness to the fact that it was Kanth who had allowed extra seats in the theatre for any consideration, CBI had said.

"CBI had filed the chargesheet in March last year and had given a clean chit to Amod Kanth. The matter is still stuck on a procedural issue," Neelam Krishnamurthy, who lost her two children in the inferno, said.

The Uphaar fire victims' association, AVUT, led by Krishnamurthy, had sought rejection of CBI's report and pressed for prosecution of Kanth for his alleged role in allowing extra seats in the balcony which they said had led to closure of exit gates after the fire.

59 victims died of asphyxia during the screening of Hindi blockbuster movie 'Border' on June 13, 1997 in a fire that had engulfed the theatre in south Delhi.

PTI

First Published: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 21:01

Comments


View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments