HC reserves orders on plea against exempting CBI
  • This Section
  • Latest
  • Web Wrap
Last Updated: Wednesday, August 24, 2011, 22:34
Chennai: The Madras High Court on Wednesday reserved its orders on a PIL challenging a Centre's notification exempting CBI from the purview of the RTI Act.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M Y Eqbal and Justice T S Sivagnanam reserved orders after hearing arguments on the petition filed by RTI activist and advocate S Vijayalakashmi seeking to declare the June 9 notification as ultra vires the Constitution.

In its counter affidavit, the Union government asserted that the right to information was not an absolute right and pointed out that there was a need to balance the right of a citizen against the need to ensure the security of the nation, which should not be jeopardized due to disclosure of information with security implications.

"The exemption granted to CBI under section 24 is not a blanket exemption inasmuch as the exemption is subject to the provisos of section 24 of the RTI Act," submitted K G Verma, Joint Secretary in the Union Department of Personnel and Training, attached to the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions.

Hence, allegations pertaining to corruption and human rights violations were still within the purview of the RTI Act, subject to other provisions of the act, he said.

The officer submitted that cases handled by the CBI were very sensitive and inputs based on intelligence collected which could relate to the security of the state.

"In many sensitive cases the collection of intelligence and the process of investigation and trial are intertwined and cannot be separated," the affidavit said.

Claiming that the petitioner's contentions were false and misleading, the centre prayed for dismissal of the petition. CBI, in a separate counter affidavit, claimed the right to information with respect to other fundamental rights under Article 19(1) of the Constitution "is not an unfettered right and is subject to reasonable restrictions".


First Published: Wednesday, August 24, 2011, 22:34

comments powered by Disqus