Supreme Court moved for contempt against Mamata

Aprakash Gupta - Delhi
We all know what she has said is partially true. But the question is why is she picking on the judiciary only. All Govt Depts. be it the civic authorities, police or any other authority including politicians (her own fraternity) are buyable commodities. Is she charging the judiciary because it went against her? People are taking bribes right under her nose. Even election tickets are sold in her party. Even she is aware.
Reply

Kamalika - USA
How can a lady(CM of West Bengal) who worships corruption comments against judiciary! Isn`t it ridiculous? She needs to have a clear characterization of herself before criticizing others! She proved her inefficiency in controlling corruption in the state where every women feels insecure! Again, when she has no answer for her wrongdoings, she blames the person as being a `Maoist`, who questions her inefficiency. She is so overwhelmed to have powers which she can`t decide how to exploit! She totally lost her credibility to the people who had elected her as CM. God save the state from her whims!
Reply

S.V.Ramanan - Bangalore
There is a lot of wind over West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Bannerjee’s observation that Court Judgements can be bought in India. Mamata Bannerjee may not be correct in all her policies or her impulsive actions or at times adolescent behaviour. That does not mean whatever she says is incorrect, as in this case. Is it not a fact way back around late eighties Justice Veeraswamy of The Supreme Court was indicted for corruption and was forced to resign? Is it not a fact a Judge of the CBI Court in Andhra Pradesh was caught red handed accepting a Four Crore bribe for granting bail to Satyam Scam Ramalinga Raju, suspended and is under interrogation? Was it not a Calcutta High Court Judge(or Supreme Court?) who escaped impeachment for misappropriating PF money? Was not a warrant of arrest issued against the then President of India, APJ. Abdul Kalam by a Magistrate for a consideration with out even knowing who the accused was? Litigants always hire a Lawyer who is close to the Judge trying the case. Is it not a fact that the immediate past Supreme Court Judge observed that the majority of the Judiciary is corrupt? ‘Contempt of Court’ for stating the Truth?
Reply

vijayakumar - nellore
Government of India should order CBI to probe into the matter what Didi accused. And we will know the truth what is going on in judiciary system.
Reply

R.S.RAMARAO - HYDERABAD
It has become a common practice for the participants in LAW fieild( Lawyers, Judges etc.)to feel as if their injured beyond repair when some adverse comments are made on their mal functioning as if they are protected by constitution to be immune for such remarks.Can anybody in the judicial field challenge the fact that the judgments delivered by them are not always fool proof?.Certainly not,irrespective of the level of the court. At the best ,they can say that the judgment delivered by them is on the basis of evidence adduced before them whether oral or documentary(which also in many cases differs from court to court in appeals).In some cases the discretary powers of the judges tend for corruption in them which is not far from truth.While the situation is like this, how can anybody from the judicial wing,charge Mamata Benergy for her recent comments,which is nothing but an image of the facts .Instead of returning fire up on her,they should reform their procedures in each section, for which there is ample of scope
Reply

DN SHARMA - NEW DELHI
It is high time that some restraints need be put on self-righteous unreasonably uncontrollable Chief Minister of West Bengal Mrs Mamta Banerjee.After her electroral victories she has become more irresponsibl and more illegally authoritarian.
Reply

Tutu - Bhagalpur
Mamata Banerjee is 100% correct - except the place / platform and her blunt way of talking. Some judges , specially, lower court judges can always be influenced. She is right in that way but opposition / left front got opportunity to put her in trouble.
Reply

B RaghunadhaRao - Hyderabad
She maybe right to certain extent since inthe recent past in AP bail for Gali janardhanaReddy has been deliverd for money.
Reply

SATISH KUMAR BHALLA - JALANDHAR CANTT
The West Bengal Chief Minister Mamta merely has alleged that there were instances when Court Judgements were delivered for money.Why there is too much of hue and cry.It is nowhere hidden that to some nominal extent there is truth it may be bitter for persons involved in it or showing farce prestige.
Reply

Krishna Kanth - Mumbai
One joke: Digvijay Singh’s wife died and went to heaven. As she stood in front of Yamraj, she saw a huge wall of clocks behind. She asked, ``What are all those clocks?`` Yamraj answered, ``Those are LieClocks. Everyone on Earth has a LieClock. Every time you lie, the hands on your clock will move.``...``Oh,`` said Diggy’s wife, ``Who`s clock is that?`` That`s Gautam Buddha`s. The hands have never moved indicating that he never told a lie. ``And whose clock is that?`` That`s Mahathma Gandhi clock. The hands have only moved twice, telling us that Gandhiji only told 2 lies in his entire life.`` She asked, ``Where`s my Diggy`s clock?`` Diggy``s clock is in my office``, replied yamraj, ``I`m using it as a ceiling fan.
Reply