Australian senators reject laws on asylum seekers
Canberra: Senators on Thursday rejected laws that would have enabled Australia to turn away asylum seekers to discourage them from attempting long and dangerous ocean journeys in rickety boats.
The legislation had scraped through the House of Representatives late Wednesday by 74 votes to 72 after six hours of passionate debate, amplified by two recent deadly accidents involving boats filled with Australia-bound migrants. But the Senate rejected the bill 39 votes to 29 after sometimes tearful arguments.
More than 90 people are believed to have died in a capsizing last week midway between the Australian territory of Christmas Island and Indonesia, and another four are believed to have died in a capsizing on Wednesday.
The legislation would have enabled the government to deport asylum seekers who arrive by boat to another country in Southeast Asia or the Pacific.
Boat arrivals are currently sent to Christmas Island to have their asylum claims assessed, although many asylum seekers have been transferred to the Australian mainland in recent months because of overcrowding at the island detention facilities.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard had urged senators to pass the law today before Parliament takes a six-week break. After the Senate vote, Gillard accused opposition leader Tony Abbott of making no effort to compromise on legislation she said could save lives.
"Mr Abbott did not move one millimetre at any stage of this ... While people are drowning at sea," she told reporters.
Both Gillard`s centre-left Labor Party and the conservative opposition coalition agree that sending asylum seekers to a third country to have their refugee claims assessed is the best option for putting people smugglers out of business and to curb the flow of boats.
But they differ on where the asylum seekers should be sent. The government wants to send them to Malaysia as part of a swap deal in which Australia would resettle UN-recognised refugees from Kuala Lumpur.
The opposition rejects Malaysia and any other country that has not signed the UN Convention on Refugees, for fear that the asylum seekers` rights will not be respected. The coalition prefers the tiny Pacific atoll of Nauru, where a previous conservative Australian government had paid for and maintained an immigration detention centre.
The opposition could not have defeated the measure on its own, but it was joined by the minor Greens party, which is part of Gillard`s minority government. Unlike either of the main parties, the Greens, believe Australia should accept all boat arrivals.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- 24 dead after boat carrying 40 capsizes in river Ganga in Patna; many still missing
- Dr Subhash Chandra Show: What characteristics define a true leader?
- Tourists flock to Manali as snowfall takes a short break
- Assembly elections: BJP likely to announce its first list of candidates for UP, Uttarakhand
- Delhi horror: Pedophile held for sexually assaulting 600 girls
- Abhishek Bachchan reveals the moment when Aishwarya Rai said 'yes' to him
- India vs England, 1st ODI: As it happened...
- India vs England, Pune ODI: MS Dhoni still the boss; convinces Virat Kohli with spot on DRS call — WATCH
- India vs England, 1st ODI: Ravichandran Aswhin steals the show with huge six — WATCH
- Petrol price hiked by 42 paisa per litre, diesel by Rs 1.03 a litre