Either with us or against us: US to Pak post 9/11
Zeenews
       English        
Thursday, May 31, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
World

Either with us or against us: US to Pak post 9/11

Last Updated: Sunday, September 11, 2011, 21:24
Comments 2  
Tags: USPakistan9/11
Either with us or against us: US to Pak post 9/11 Washington: The US gave Pakistan the choice of "either with us or against us" in the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks as Islamabad was handed out a long list of demands to be met immediately, according to declassified documents released on the 10th anniversary of the tragedy.

A day after al Qaeda terrorist struck the twin towers in New York with hijacked planes killing nearly 3,000 people, a top US official told Mahmoud Ahmed, the then chief of the Pakistani spy agency ISI, that Islamabad has no "maneuvering choice" but to decided "either be with us or against us".

Two days later the then Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf was handed out a long list of demands, including blanket overflight and landing rights and cutoff all shipments of fuel to the Taliban, according to latest set of declassified documents released by the National Security Archive today on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.

One of these documents shows the communication between US and ISI officials in which US insists that Islamabad choose between the US or the Taliban: "This was a black-and-white choice, with no grey."

The day after the 9/11 attacks, the then Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage met with Ahmed, the documents says, adding that the US official presented a "stark choice" in a 15-minute meeting.

"Pakistan must either stand with the United States in its fight against terrorism or stand against us. There was no maneuvering room."

Mahmud assures Armitage that the US "could count on Pakistan's 'unqualified support,' that Islamabad would do whatever was required of it by the US".

Armitage adamantly denies Pakistan has the option of a middle road between supporting the Taliban and the US, "this was a black-and-white choice, with no grey."

ISI chief Mahmoud in 2001 responds by commenting "that Pakistan has always seen such matters in black-and-white. It has in the past been accused of 'being-in-bed' with those threatening US interests. He wanted to dispel that misconception," according to the declassified documents released by the National Security Archive (NSA) today.

Mahmoud's denial of longstanding historical Pakistani support for extremists in Afghanistan directly conflicts with US intelligence on the issue, which has documented extensive Pakistani support for the Taliban and multiple other militant organizations.

"It is interesting to read this document ten years after it was initially written, as it is largely assumed that Islamabad over the past decade has taken the 'grey' approach Armitage steadfastly denies as a potential position. Pakistan has served as a safe haven for the Taliban insurgency, while Islamabad simultaneously assists the US in its war against al Qaeda and the Taliban," the NSA says in its comments.

Two days later on September 13, 2001 Armitage tells Mahmoud the US is looking for full cooperation and partnership from Pakistan, understanding that the decision whether or not to fully comply with US demands would be "a difficult choice for Pakistan."

He then presents Mahmoud with the specific requests for immediate action and asks that he present them to President Musharraf for approval.

These includes stop al Qaeda operatives at Pak-Afghan border, intercept arms shipments through Pakistan and end all logistical support for bin Ladin and provide the US with blanket overflight and landing rights to conduct all necessary military and intelligence operations.

Armitage also asks the then ISI boss to provide territorial access to US and allied military intelligence, and other personnel to conduct all necessary operations against the perpetrators of terrorism or those that harbour them, including use of Pakistan's naval ports, airbases and strategic locations on borders.

Pakistan was also asked to provide the US immediately with intelligence, information, to help prevent and respond to terrorist acts perpetuated against the US, its friends and allies.

Islamabad was told to continue to publicly condemn the terrorist acts of September 11 and any other terrorist acts against the US or its friends and allies and cut off all shipments of fuel to the Taliban and any other items and recruits, including volunteers en route to Afghanistan that can be used in a military offensive capacity or to abet the terrorist threat.

Should the evidence strongly implicate Osama bin Laden and the al Qaeda network in Afghanistan and should Afghanistan and the Taliban continue to harbour him and this network, Pakistan will break diplomatic relations with the Taliban government, end support for the Taliban and assist us in the formentioned ways to destroy bin Ladin, Musharraf was asked.

PTI

First Published: Sunday, September 11, 2011, 20:14

Comments

BRIJ - NEWYORK
MR MAKHIJA YOU ARE SO RIGHT.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI...INDIA
NOW PAKISTAN WANTS TO BE WITH CHINA BUT WILL NOT LEAVE US AS A VERY GOOD SOURCE OF INCOME..........FOR DECADES
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Ahmed - Mumbai
Pakistan is not a ``wanna be`` friend with china but already has strong friendship bond with china. India on the other hand has good ties with iran but would not leave US for minting money. For decades ,) Although we do say hindi cheni bhai bhai, but in reality its not the case. We should also start thinking to let go sinking iran and lean towards our neighbor china
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

Ahmed - Mumbai
Pakistan is not a ``wanna be`` friend with china but already has strong friendship bond with china. India on the other hand has good ties with iran but would not leave US for minting money. For decades ,) Although we do say hindi cheni bhai bhai, but in reality its not the case. We should also start thinking to let go sinking iran and lean towards our neighbor china