Tokyo: Japan`s Parliament approved on Friday a state secrets law that stiffens penalties for leaks by government officials and for journalists who seek such information, overriding criticism that it could be used to cover up government abuses and suppress civil liberties.
The ruling coalition forced a vote on the bill in an upper house committee yesterday. Despite stalling tactics by opposition parties, the full upper house approved the bill today by 130 to 82.
The more powerful lower house had approved the bill last week.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who is seeking to increase Japan`s global security role and create a more authoritarian government at home, says the law is needed to protect national security and assuage US concerns over the risks of sharing strategically sensitive information with Tokyo.
Critics worry the law could be used to hinder public disclosures, punish whistleblowers or muzzle the media since journalists could be jailed for seeking information they do not know is classified as secret.
The bill allows heads of ministries and agencies to classify 23 vaguely worded types of information related to defense, diplomacy, counterintelligence and counterterrorism, almost indefinitely.
Even some members of Abe`s Liberal Democratic Party complained that the government rushed too quickly to get the bill approved before the end of the current parliamentary session.
"I think there needs to be more explanation," party member Takashi Uto said during the committee debate. "Naturally people are concerned because they don`t know what will be a secret."
Most objections to the legislation were over human rights implications. However, during the final debate, lawmakers also questioned how the law might affect civilian employees doing business with government agencies.
Foreign businesses engaged in defence contracting, or even companies dealing in "dual-use" technologies and products that have military applications could be affected, said Lawrence Repeta, a law professor at Meiji University in Tokyo.
"If you`re in contact with the government, you`re at risk of crossing a line even if you don`t know there`s a line there," Repeta said. "You could be in the position of trying to sell a product that might involve designated secrets. It`s something companies have to think about. It`s an entirely new area."