Vienna: A US scientist who visited a secret North Korean nuclear site last year says Pyongyang may seek to launch a third atomic test to enable it to develop a small fissile warhead that can be carried by a missile.
Siegfried Hecker — who first revealed news of a previously clandestine North Korean uranium enrichment plant — also expanded on details of that facility on Friday. He said it was more advanced than Iran`s enrichment operation, and could be re-engineered to turn out enough fissile material to make two nuclear weapons a year.
The North tested nuclear devices in 2006 and 2009 based on plutonium — like enriched uranium, a potential source of fissile warhead material.
North Korea dismantled or mothballed much of its plutonium producing capacity several years ago as part of now shattered commitments to denuclearise in exchange for economic and political concessions from the US and other global or regional powers.
Before that, however, the North amassed enough plutonium for up to seven bombs.
At a lecture on Friday, Hecker said Pyongyang remains committed to having a nuclear deterrent and may want to launch a test at least one more time to progress from developing a small and sophisticated missile warhead from the basic weapon it now has.
"The second test was a necessity because the first one didn`t work well," Hecker said. While the North now has the knowledge to make "a rudimentary plutonium bomb ... they would need one more nuclear test" to develop a modern missile warhead, he said.
Hecker said that the North has appeared to shut down its plutonium production for good after dismantling its Yongybon reactor and mothballing other facilities four years ago, but expressed concern about the enrichment program that he revealed last year.
In a confidential report obtained last week by a news agency, the International Atomic Energy agency said the enrichment plant contained about 2,000 centrifuges and the North Koreans had told Hecker`s group that the machines were setup to produce low-enriched uranium, used for reactor fuel. North Korea has a small research reactor fuelled by low-enriched uranium.
But Hecker on Friday said that — if reconfigured — the facility could churn out up to 40 kilograms of 90 percent highly-enriched and weapons grade uranium each year. That would be enough material for two nuclear bombs.
He did not discount speculation that North Korea had helped Iran develop Tehran`s larger uranium enrichment program — an activity that has led to four sets of UN Security Council sanctions over fears Tehran could use the program to make fissile weapons-grade material.
But Hecker noted that Pyongyang`s program was more advanced than Iran`s, with the North Koreans using more efficient centrifuges than the Islamic Republic, which appears not to have progressed in its advanced centrifuge manufacture beyond the testing stage.
The IAEA has assessed that North Korea built Syria`s now levelled nuclear reactor, and Hecker said that underlined the potential of Pyongyang as an illicit proliferator, along with its record of clandestinely exporting its missile technology. He said the Syrian facility, which was destroyed by Israeli war planes in 2007, appeared to have no other purpose that to produce plutonium.
North Korea`s enrichment activities are "not a big problem" if restricted to what has now been revealed, said Hecker, while expressing concern of hidden sites elsewhere.
If North Korea is making large amounts of enriched uranium "it becomes a problem, especially in terms of export," he said, adding that with the North already "into the nuclear export business" it is going to be very difficult to shut down such illicit trade.
Pyongyang had denied US assessments that it had a secret uranium enrichment program until November 12 when it allowed a small group led by Hecker to inspect the facility. Hecker, a professor in the Department of Management Science and Engineering at Stanford University, in Palo Alto, California, subsequently informed the US government of what he saw.
Both Iran and North Korea are under UN Security Council sanctions — the North for its nuclear and missile tests, and Iran primarily for refusing to stop enrichment despite concerns that it could turn the program toward making weapons — a path Iran says it will never take.
Concerns over those nations and Syria will be discussed at a 35-nation IAEA board meeting starting on Monday.