SC anguished on tardy trial
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Sunday, May 26, 2013 
Search
Nation

SC anguished on tardy trial

Last Updated: Saturday, December 29, 2012, 00:51     A- A A+
Comments 1
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed anguish over "unhappy state of affairs" of lower courts which take years in concluding the trial and said the proceedings must be concluded within a reasonable time.

A bench of justices Swatanter Kumar and Madan B Lokur said the governments and the courts must gear up the administrative machinery for quick disposal of cases.

"It is high time that the state and the courts gear up their administrative machinery so that at least a trial for a heinous offence gets concluded within a reasonable period," said the bench while delivering a verdict in a 1983 murder case in which trial went on for 14 long years.

"The investigation took almost four years to complete despite eyewitnesses who knew the appellant. The trial concluded after another 14 years or about 18 years after the murder. This is a rather unhappy state of affairs," the bench said.

In this case, the bench upheld the trial court's verdict awarding life imprisonment to the convict.

"The murder was committed on the intervening night of October 8-9, 1983. A charge sheet was filed sometime in 1987 and the trial court delivered its judgement on June 29, 2001. These time gaps are telling," the bench added while expressing anguish over the delay in conclusion of trial.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Saturday, December 29, 2012, 00:51

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

karmik - Canada
The Supreme Court sheds some concern periodically over ``slow judicial process`` but in reality this process violates human rights. The process itself is a mockery and the judicial process has become part of the punishment. The judiciary has no accountability and the political parties want to protect hooligans they elect in the guise of a slow and painful litigation process. Since they are benefitting from the arrangement, there is no push for judicial or police reforms..very sad...Karmik
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest

Nation

Consider Army porters` plea for regularisation: SC


Read More »