Top Iran officials question UN-brokered nuclear deal
Tehran: Top Iranian figures criticised on Saturday a UN-brokered deal to produce nuclear fuel for Tehran from its own partly enriched uranium, apparently contradicting what President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad himself had proposed.
Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said Western powers were trying to "cheat" Iran through the deal, under which Tehran would export low-enriched uranium (LEU) to be further enriched and converted into nuclear fuel for a reactor in Tehran.
"Westerners are insisting to go in a direction that speaks of cheating and are imposing some things on us," Larijani told ISNA news agency.
"They are saying we will give you the 20 percent (enriched uranium) fuel for the Tehran reactor only if you give us your enriched uranium. I see no link between these two things."
But that is essentially what Ahmadinejad himself proposed on September 30.
"We need 19.75 percent-enriched uranium. We said that, and we propose to buy it from anybody who is ready to sell it to us. We are ready to give 3.5 percent-enriched uranium and then they can enrich it more and deliver to us 19.75 percent-enriched uranium," the President said.
Ahmadinejad was speaking just ahead of an October 1 meeting in Geneva at which the proposal was apparently put on the table, and which drew a positive reaction from Russia and France.
The full details of deal eventually hammered out have not been released, but France has said it calls on Iran to hand over to Russia by the end of the year 1,200 kilogrammes
of LEU it has at a plant in Natanz.
Russia would enrich the material to the 19.75 percent needed for use in a research reactor in Tehran that makes radio-isotopes for medical use.
Diplomats say Russia would sub-contract to France the process of turning the enriched uranium into the fuel rods for the reactor.
But ISNA said Larijani, Iran`s former nuclear negotiator, termed the deal as illegal and illogical.
"The important thing in this nuclear issue is that Westerners should not cheat. We have a nuclear reactor in Tehran and according to the IAEA rules, they have to supply the fuel for it," Larijani said.
And the Chairman of the Iranian Parliament`s national security and foreign policy committee, Alaeddin Borujerdi, also questioned the deal.
He said Iran would be better off buying nuclear fuel directly than entering into the deal.
"It is better to buy 20 percent enriched fuel and keep the 3.5 percent for our domestic power plants ... than give it to those countries," ISNA quoted Borujerdi as saying.
"Iran itself needs the 3.5 percent enriched fuel, so it is in its interest to keep it," Borujerdi said. Iran was to give its response to the IAEA deal by Friday, but has delayed it until next week.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Till when will Kerala suffer violence in the name of politics?
- Till when will Kerala suffer violence in the name of politics? - Part II
- Till when will Kerala suffer violence in the name of politics? - Part III
- Till when will Kerala suffer violence in the name of politics? - Part IV
- Why is Mehbooba Mufti attacking Hindu beliefs for votes?
- French Open 2016: Angry Nick Kyrgios, Petra Kvitova pass chilly Roland Garros tests
- Working towards a technology which enables consumer to control electrical appliances at home sitting in office: TPDDL CEO Praveer Sinha
- Modi in Iran: PM promises big celebration of Guru Gobind Singh's birth anniversary
- Pooja Rani ousted, no 2016 Rio Olympic quota for Indian women boxers
- Modi government's two years in power disastrous: Congress