US court rejects demand for default judgement against Sonia Gandhi
New York: A federal judge here has rejected a demand by a rights group seeking a default judgement against Congress President Sonia Gandhi in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case and given them four weeks time to amend the complaint, given the "legal infirmities" in their case.
Gandhi`s Counsel Ravi Batra said in an emailed statement to PTI that, contrary to claims by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), Gandhi was not served summons during her visit to the city for medical purposes last month.
Batra said he has informed the federal judge that the New York court lacks personal and subject matter jurisdiction in the case and SFJ has been indulging in "improper judge and venue shopping."
SFJ had yesterday filed a service-affidavit with the US District Court in the Eastern District of New York claiming that an "alternate" service was served on Gandhi on September 9 through the receptionist, nurse supervisor and security employees at the Sloan-Kettering Memorial Hospital here.
SFJ had also requested for a mandatory default judgement to be issued against Gandhi, a demand that was rejected by the presiding judge.
Batra said Judge Cogan of the district court has granted SFJ`s counsel four weeks to amend the complaint, given the "legal infirmities" in their case.
Batra said he will move the court to dismiss the lawsuit and seek an injunction against the group.
"We will then move to dismiss the case with finality, seek an anti-suit injunction against SFJ, and other appropriate relief to remedy provable bad faith?and/or vexations litigation by plaintiff.
Earlier this week Batra had said that SFJ indulged in an "improper judge-and-venue-shopping" by filing lawsuits against Congress party and its leaders, including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Gandhi, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Kamal Nath in various federal courts in the US.
Batra had said Gandhi has "not been served with process" in the anti-Sikh riots case.
Sikhs for Justice has filed cases against the Congress party and its leaders for shielding and protecting party leaders allegedly involved in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in Delhi.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Highlights - India vs England 2nd ODI in Cuttack
- DNA: Manish Sisodia faces CBI probe over alleged irregularities in 'Talk To AK' programme
- Donald Trump to be sworn in as 45th US President today
- Barack Obama thanks Americans for making him a 'better man'
- Exclusive: Srinagar freezes at minus 3; common man struggles for basic commodities
- WATCH: MS Dhoni asks Jasprit Bumrah to go easy after he hurriedly ran out England skipper Eoin Morgan
- Accused of Muslim-bias on visa applications, Sushma Swaraj hits back
- WATCH: How MS Dhoni saved Yuvraj Singh's wicket with another successful DRS review
- India vs England: After Virender Sehwag, Sachin Tendulkar gives Piers Morgan cricketing gyan
- Donald Trump's Inauguration Day: As it happened