Babri demolition: Vinay Katiyar Vs Zafaryab Jilani
Zeenews
       English        
Saturday, February 11, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Zee Exclusive

Babri demolition: Vinay Katiyar Vs Zafaryab Jilani

Last Updated: Tuesday, December 08, 2009, 10:00
Views 3245 Comments 17  
Babri demolition: Vinay Katiyar Vs Zafaryab Jilani Babri Mosque demolition was probably the worst act of political idealism in India’s secular history. It reflects the power games of and the irrational lengths the politicians can traverse to serve their agenda. Post the destruction of Babri by a mob of zealots on December 6, 1992, communal riots claimed more than 2000 lives in many major Indian cities including Mumbai, and Delhi.

On December 16 that year, the Liberhan Commission was set up to probe the circumstances that led to the demolition. Two people who were directly involved with Babri- but on the opposite ends- the firebrand leader of BJP, Vinay Katiyar (over phone) and Babri Masjid Action Committee President, Zafaryab Jilani conversed exclusively with Devika Chhibber of Zeenews.com, on several subjects ranging from the Hindutva to the role of Vajpayee and Narsimha Rao in the demolition act.

Excerpts:

What do you think about the Liberhan Commission report disclosure?

Katiyar:
Liberhan report is a novel authored by the Congress. The whole blame has been laid on the shoulders of the saffron party leaders. No mention of what the Congress PM was doing at that time has been detailed nor questioned. So it is a biased report with no actual revelation of the events or people involved in it.

Jilani: Whether the report has been leaked or not is not of any consequence. I have always wanted to see the actual culprits behind bars. The contents of the report are true otherwise why the government would have cleared it.

What about the role of Hindu parties, which they have been denying so far?

Katiyar:
Hindu parties were never involved into the whole incident. I was involved and I am not at all apologetic for it. It was the happiest day of my life. It was not a Mosque but a disputed structure at Ayodhya which we knocked down. We still want a Ram temple in Ayodhya and there is no change in our stand.

Jilani: Hindu parties were of course involved. The report has itself indicted 58 people of which several belong to the saffron party. I don’t agree to Katiyar’s statement. People like Katiyar are totally irrelevant. They are the culprits who pulled-down our religious belonging and played with our sentiments. Justice is still awaited by our community and we won’t rest until they are punished.

Do you think it was pre-planned?

Katiyar:
Not at all. It was just a wave of religious sentiments, which at that moment outdid our rational thoughts and acts respectively. I am not against Muslims. Even they are human beings. But Hindutva is my priority and in order to protect it I can go to any extent.

Jilani: I totally disagree with Katiyar here. The demolition act was an act of full fledged preparation. A lot of planning was involved in the demolition. It was pre-planned and taken off brick by brick. Although we have no evidence, I believe that even Narsimha Rao’s role was doubtful as he did nothing to prevent the act when he had the power to do so.

BJP is denying Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s involvement in demolition, your take on it?

Katiyar:
Vajpayee ji was never involved in the whole thing. His status is very high in the party. Congress is unable to solve the existing problems in the country therefore they are distracting attention of the public through such reports. They have raised this issue to malign the BJP’s reputation.

Jilani: Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s name has never been mentioned anywhere in the report clearly. He was aware of the situation but his involvement is not evidenced. He is a senior leader and even if he is involved I am sure his name would never appear directly in the books.

What about Kalyan Singh’s hypocrite standing on Babri demolition?

Katiyar:
Hypocrite is the right word for him....(he refuses to comment further)

Jilani: People like Kalyan Singh keep changing their stands. He was among those who were responsible for the destruction. He also apologized while teaming up with the SP but now his glorifying stance on the demolition can only mean that he want to be a part of BJP again.

What will be your strategy further?

Katiyar:
BJP is working towards its strategy to provide a terror free government to the people with cheaper basic amenities. We also promise to build the Ram Mandir at any cost. BJP is suffering from internal crisis but we will be back in power soon.

Jilani: We are satisfied with the disclosure of the Liberhan report but we still have some demands, which we want the government to look into. First of all how the cases related to Babri will be expedited. Secondly, the report has indicted 58 people whereas CBI has marked 49 candidates so what about the missing ones. Thirdly, procedures of the cases tend to slow down with the transfer of the officers in command as they act according to the agenda of the party in power. So we will put impetus on the government to look into these matters.

Has India gone beyond Babri now; does rhetoric politics work no longer?

Katiyar:
Religion can never be away from life. Babri Mosque was never there, it was always our temple and people’s sentiments are attached with it. So whenever we feel that any wrong is being committed against our community we will always act offensively. All those who do not support Babri Masjid demolition are supporters of Babar, be it journalists or any other people and we are against them completely.

Jilani: Those who believe that the layman can be fooled by the religious sentiments are morons. Yes, religion is precious to all but not at the cost of life, property and prosperity. It is now 16 years that we have been fighting for our cause and will continue till the guilty are punished.

First Published: Tuesday, December 08, 2009, 10:00

Comments

ayub - delhi
....1 dusre pe lipa poti karne se achha agar hum khud apne girebaan me dekhe to behtar he...koi kisi se kam nhi..na hi koi piche hatna chahta...mera 1 question he sabhi se....kya logo ko marne katne ke baad waha...jo ki pahle ho bhi chuka he(1992)..waha ab mandir ya masjid banana chahiye??...kya humare khuda ya raam is se santust ho jayenge???.kya hum log hindu, muslim, sikh...hi rahenge..kabhi bhartiye(indian)nhi ban payenge...shame on us...kabhi marathi kabhi bihari...kabhi up..bus isi baat pe ladte rahana..yaro ab to educated ban jao..jaise jhola chhap doctor hote he..waise hi humare desh ke neta(leader) bhi jhola chaap he..inko bus samaaj se bedakhal karo..tyyar ho jao inke khilaf......unite with each other..otherwise we loose everthing..apni culture bachao...bus.........
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
kadir - pune
@ satish kumar - dubai
yes satish i m agreed with u but muslims r praying namaj on road only 1 time at the moment of eid only but if u see d ganeshutsav, diwali, navratri, holi, dashehara which are praying or doing on govt. road or ground and also it makes lots of noise polutions. indian muslims r performing namaj on road only for 10 minutes i.e. also on moent of eid
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
mita shan - india
In 21st century where we talk about the progress and development such kinds of incidents showed that we are still backward, use religion for our own means. Killing people on name of religion and tragetting religious strucutres do not solve the problems but add more problems to the nations.
We should stand up as a nation not as hindu , muslim, sikh and chirtsan whatever, we are not delhities, mumbikar we are indian and no one has right to question other liberty.
west made progress as they are united and work togther respect each other, but here in india the mirrior is back here we are still chained on the name of relgion, caste, rich, region based.
I felt really shamed when these kinds of incidents occured, whether jt was babri masjid, skih riots, godhra riots, orrisa massarce etc all make us shamed not as proudy!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Satish Kumar - Dubai, UAE
All so called minority relegion can do in India whatever they wish to do but so called majority Hindu have all restircations in their own country. If anyone see the pictures of yesterday Punjab Bandh where Sardar were out on the roads with arms and amunition freely on the roads. No media is brigning this violation but if Shiv Sainiks or Bajarang Dal do little of this it will be well hyped in media.

Today I read in news paper that supreme court has instructed Delhi govt to demolish the temples on public land which surely be done shortly but I remember seeing the encroachment in Delhi on main ring road (Moti Bagh) where Sardar has built their Gurdwara on the ring road and big traffic jam is always is problem there? Who will demolish this?
How one can forget encroachment is prime CP area by Sardar at Bangla Sahib gurdwara? Who will remove this?

Noone in India.

During id it was in Indian media muslim praying on the highway (Delhi-Jaipur)? Why none stop this/ Where is Supreme court of India? Why media is not highlighting all this?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Rajesh Sahni - New Delhi, India
Well Muslim asking for punishing Hindu leaders should first see whether their leaders & people are at all adhearing to the Indian law or not? Today forget the common man or even SHO or ACP/DCP can not thought of removing any illegal encroachment they have done on public land. It is in India where Hindu`s temples can be demolished or they are not allowed to park vehicles outside the temples but musilms are allowed to pray on the roads which even not allowed even in musilm countries?

Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Neeraj - New Delhi
Again, it is congress, who is responsible for all these kind of disputes, whether it is ayodhya , Kashmir, or marathi controversy. From the beginning (right from the independence), leaders like M K gandhi and J L Nehru(of which keep singing day and night) kept their interest bofore that of the country. They`ve tried to keep all the credit of independence and almost became successful too. And they left the country with such controversies that can never end. Controversial issues are Secular country(Mind it, the country has been divided on the base of religion), reservation, kashmir issues, etc... and we`ll have to suffer for all this endlessly. If a hindu gets hurt here, it is only a person from minor caste and if it is a muslim, they cry that india is partial towards them. So, none of the upper caste people gets hurt ever here, in fact he/she doesn`t have a right to get... So the great people of my Great India keep fighting...n our Nero`s will keep sleeping till they don`t see their personal advantage out of it...
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
sajid - Dubai
I totally agreed with Vijay.......... why to fight with each other instaed of that, we can build huge hospital so that people can visit there who is in actual need...
God will not be happy if you give him a big palace to stay there.... i belive he `ll be more happy.....where we people use his place for good reason.

sajid
Dubai
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
aum - USA
rajiv you are right to some extent .The demolition of that place was not at all unfortunate It is right of all HINDUS to distroy all I mean ALL muslims structures which were taken over by muslimog afghan origin looter who unfortunately became moghals We have right to take back our properties Jai Hind VANDE MATRAM
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Aum - USA
muslims should giveup ayodhya babri they have no right over it as it was built over mandit and HINDUs should unite against this corrupt anti national congress government and throw them out og power. HINDUS have fundamental right to distroy all structures which were forcibly taken over by afghan lootera moghal kingdom who were not INDIAN bot a looter who happend to be aso called king all muslims were HINDUS they should respect hindus as they are allowed to worship mullas
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
SALAM BAWAHAB - UAE
I AM AN INDIAN MUSLIM. i am not sure there will be any action taken against any of the culprits indicated by librahan commision. but what i hope with my hindu brothers is ,they will punish this leaders who for the sake of vote wanted to divde india.i think this are not there real hindu leaders.people like vinay katariya,ashok singhal & kalyan singh they can just talk against muslims,encourage communal hatred but they cant take muslims out of india couz india belongs to muslims as much its belongs to any hindus...the last thing .I STILL SAY``SAARE JAHAN SE AACHA HINDUSTAN HAMARA``
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments