Russia threatens to veto Syria resolution at UN
New York: Russia shot down suggestions from some UN Security Council members of an imminent deal on a draft resolution aimed at stopping Syria's bloody upheaval, warning it would veto the current text if it were put to a vote on Friday.
Pakistan's UN envoy said on Thursday the council was "two words away" from agreement and the council chairman from Togo said a consensus was near on an amended version of a draft backing an Arab League plan for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down.
But Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told a closed-door session of the world body that Moscow would veto the draft if it were submitted on Friday with a phrase saying the council "fully supports" the plan, several Western diplomats said.
European and Arab drafters of the text planned to revise the text in a last-ditch attempt to allay Russian concerns and submit an amended version of the resolution to the council later on Thursday, diplomats said.
Morocco's UN envoy Mohammed Loulichki told reporters after Thursday's council meeting that he would deliver the new draft to the council and seek a vote "as soon as possible”.
US Ambassador Susan Rice made clear that the council had once again failed to reach an agreement. "We had what I would characterise as sometimes difficult but ultimately useful discussions," she said. "We're still working. This is not done."
Churkin told reporters that Thursday's inconclusive negotiations were "something of a roller-coaster”.
"We have a text which we are going to report to our capitals," he said. He declined to provide details but suggested how Russia might vote remained an open question. He said the fact that the draft could reach the council "does not pre-judge anything in any way”.
Colombian Ambassador Nestor Osorio said council members would continue their discussions on Friday.
Submitting what some diplomats say is a final draft resolution does not necessarily mean a vote is imminent and further revisions could follow.
France said it foresaw a vote on Friday, Saturday or Monday at the latest.
Russia has balked at any language that would open to door to "regime change" in Syria, its most important Middle Eastern ally over the almost half-century that Assad's family has ruled it.
Assad has been locked in struggle with a revolt against his rule for the past 11 months, with at least 5,000 deaths by a United Nations count.
Assad opponents continued their protests in the Syrian city of Hama on Thursday, where the President's father crushed an Islamist uprising 30 years ago. They poured red paint on the ground to symbolise the bloodshed then, prompting government troops to close public squares.
Marking the event would have been unthinkable a year ago, but what began as civilian street protests which Assad tried to crush with troops and tanks, has evolved in some regions into an armed insurgency that has spread to the gates of Damascus.
The surging violence has stirred Arab and Western calls for international action to stop the bloodshed, but that has been held up by Russian opposition to any steps that would remove Assad or pave the way to foreign intervention.
Russia and China joined forces in October to veto a Western-drafted UN resolution that would have condemned Assad's government and threatened possible sanctions.
Before Churkin weighed in, Pakistani UN Ambassador Abdullah Hussain Haroon told reporters that the 15-nation council was "two words away" from an accord. "I think we're very close. I hope today we can arrive at a unanimous resolution."
The latest resolution text includes changes made by Arab and European negotiators to meet some of Russia's concerns. It no longer spells out details of what the Arab plan entails, such as Assad giving up power, although it still "fully supports" the plan.
But those changes were not enough for Moscow. Diplomats said the language in that paragraph would have to be revised in a way that satisfies Russia without diluting the basic idea of the resolution - to have the council endorse the Arab League plan.
Russia says the West exploited what it says was fuzzy wording in a March 2011 Security Council resolution on Libya to turn a mandate to protect civilians in the North African country's uprising into a push to oust the government, backed by NATO air strikes, that led to the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi.
Moscow has also demanded language explicitly ruling out the use of external force in Syria, though the current draft makes clear the council wants the crisis resolved peacefully and the resolution could not be used as the basis for military intervention as in Libya's uprising last year.