Bangaru Laxman moves HC challenging jail term
New Delhi: Former BJP President Bangaru Laxman has moved the Delhi High Court challenging his conviction and the punishment awarded to him by a special CBI court here for taking Rs one lakh as bribe in a fictitious defence deal case.
Eleven years after having been caught in a sting operation by a news portal, Laxman was convicted and sent to four years in jail on April 28 and imposed a fine of Rs one lakh.
After spending around ten days in Tihar jail, Laxman moved the High Court seeking quashing of the trial court's conviction and sentence awarded to him for taking the bribe from fake arms dealers to recommend to the Defence Ministry to award them a contract to supply thermal binoculars to the Army.
Laxman's cousel Atul Kumar said the petition is likely to be taken up by the High Court on Friday.
He claimed that in the case the FIR has not been proved and the trial court judge has wrongly convicted him.
"The prosecution has not considered the submission made by the witnesses even though it was in his favour," the counsel said.
Laxman, 72-year-old former union minister, who was caught on camera in a 2001 sting operation conducted by tehelka.com, accepting money in his chamber in the party headquarters, had to quit as BJP President shortly after the expose which had created a huge political storm.
As per the CBI chargesheet, the Tehelka scribes had held eight meetings with Laxman between December 23, 2000, and January 7, 2001, projecting themselves as supplier of defence- related products.
CBI had alleged Laxman had accepted Rs one lakh from the representatives of the purported firm on January 1, 2001, at his office for pursuing their proposal to supply the products to the Army.
The FIR in the case was registered on December 6, 2006, against Laxman, his Assistant Personal Secretary N Umamaheshwar Raju and Personal Secretary T Satyamurthy.
Satyamurthy, however, had been granted pardon by a trial court after he turned an approver in the case while the trial could not proceed against Raju due to lack of evidence.