India vs Australia, 1st Test: India should be looking to win, says Sunil Gavaskar
Former India skipper Sunil Gavaskar believes that the Virat Kohli-led team can even win the first cricket Test if they remain in a positive frame of mind despite another good batting show by the home team on the fourth day of the encounter.
New Delhi: Former India skipper Sunil Gavaskar believes that the Virat Kohli-led team can even win the first cricket Test if they remain in a positive frame of mind despite another good batting show by the home team on the fourth day of the encounter.
Riding on another David Warner century, Australia on Friday scored 290 for five, stretching their second-innings lead to 363 and Gavaskar opined that if the hosts declare overnight, India might be in with a chance.
"Well, one has to stay positive. I'll say India can still win this match. A good opening stand and a couple of partnerships will put them in a good position. If Murali Vijay and Shikhar Dhawan get going then you never know.
"They should asses the situation at the interval and not think too far. 360 plus is not easy but bat sensibly and you are in with a chance post tea," Gavaskar told NDTV.
With Australia known to play a competitive game, Gavaskar said that the hosts were right in not declaring the innings on Day 4 and kept the visitors guessing.
"I think we will have an overnight declaration. Declaring today evening would have meant giving India a 340-run target and that would have been achievable.
"But 363 is tough and they can put Indian in trouble early. So I can understand why they didn't declare earlier. It was a good move by Australia," said Gavaskar.
Talking about debutant leg-spinner Karn Sharma's effectiveness as a bowler, Gavaskar said that the Meerut-born player has the attitude in him.
"I like his attitude. He is not afraid to get punished. In Australia, you are bound to get punished. Get hit for boundaries. But he keeps his head up. Keeps coming back at the batsmen everytime he gets hit. I think a track like Sydney will be good for him. He is a pretty decent bowler," said Gavaskar.
Also impressed with Australian spinner Nathan Lyon, who picked up a five-wicket haul in the Indian innings, Gavaskar said that the Indian batsman handled the opposition bowling attack pretty well.
"I don't think India were outspun. No doubt, he (Nathan Lyon) bowled well, it was a joy to watch him. But had he taken five wickets and India would have been bowled out for 144 runs then I would have said that they were outspun.
"But picking five wickets in a 444-run score is not out-spinning the opposition. Having said that, he is an old-fashioned off-spinner and I like him," said the former opener.
Gavaskar also believes that India's bowling combination hasn't really clicked.
"The bowling combination hasn't really clicked. India are forced to go in with six batsmen, a wicketkeeper and four bowlers. With the top batsmen not being regular bowlers even in Ranji Trophy cricket, it is a big handicap," he said.
Gavaskar also said that India will miss the injured Bhuvneshwar Kumar if the medium pacer is forced to fly back with his ankle injury.
"Bhuvneshwar's exit will prove a huge blow. He was getting good movement. He also bowls well to the left-handers and Australia have got two left-handed openers. So he could have got early breakthroughs. The footwear that bowlers wear these days is the reason behind these ankle injuries.
"His replacement, Dhawal Kulkarni, will just be a net bowler. The selectors might have selected him but the team mangement does not have much confidence in him. So he will just be bowling in the nets," Gavaskar said.
The Little Master also praise New South Wales pacer Sean Abbott for his impressive return to domestic cricket after the Phillip Hughes tragedy.
"Brings out the character inthe cricketer. That incident of course will not go away. It will haunt him whenever he bowls a bouncer. But the six wickets he took against Queensland were off good deliveries and not bouncers. So he has made a good comeback and may play for Australia as well," he concluded.