N Srinivasan should not have presided over BCCI's working committee meeting: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Monday expressed its displeasure over Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president in-exile N. Srinivasan's chairing of recent working committee meeting in Chennai.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday expressed its displeasure over Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president in-exile N. Srinivasan's chairing of recent working committee meeting in Chennai.
Concerned with the turn of events, the apex court bench of Justices T.S. Thakur and Ibrahim Kalifulla said that Srinivasan should not have presided over cricket board's working committee meeting on February 8 as he was already disqualified from holding any post in the board.
During the first day's hearing, the bench also concluded that the court has certainly found that there is a conflict of interest by his presence during the board meeting.
Before adjourning the hearing to February 27, the bench asked for an unconditional apology and explanation from the Tamil Nadu strong-man.
The hearing on contempt of court petition against N. Srinivasan, filed for the Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB) on February 18, started today. In the plea, CAB challenged Srinivasan and other BCCI officials for holding the board meeting in alleged violation of court directives.
The plea cited media reports to claim that Srinivasan had chaired the Indian cricket board's working committee meeting despite facing disqualification due to a January 22 judgement of the apex court.
On January 22, the court ruled that “no one who has any commercial interest in the BCCI events including the 1st respondent (Srinivasan) shall be eligible for contesting the elections for any post whatsoever and that the disqualification for contesting elections applicable to those who are holding any commercial interest in BCCI events shall hold good and continue till such time the person concerned holds such commercial interest or till the committee appointed by this court considers and awards suitable punishment to those liable for the same; whichever is later.”
The CAB also contended that Srinivasan continued to have commercial interest in the Indian Premier League (IPL) matches of BCCI and hence he was disqualified from holding the post of BCCI President and President of Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA).
"If this Court held Srinivasan disqualified from contesting for the post of President, BCCI until he has any commercial interest in the events of BCCI (then) it goes without saying that he is disqualified as on date to hold the post of President BCCI or be involved in working of BCCI as per the order of this court dated January, 22 2015," the petition added.
With agency inputs