Washington, June 12: Did you notice that when an Iraqi reporter flung his shoes toward former US President George W Bush during a Baghdad news conference, he dodged to avoid being hit, while Iraq`s Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who was standing next to him, did not? Well, here is a scientific reason for the difference between the two men’s reaction to the shoe attack.
Neuroscientists at the University of Washington say that there are two independent pathways in the human visual system.
"The original idea proposed is that one system guides your actions and the other guides your perception. The interesting part is the `action` system allows the brain to `see` things your eyes do not perceive," said Jeffrey Lin, a UW psychology doctoral student and lead author of a paper appearing in the journal Current Biology.
"When we throw two balls at you with very similar trajectories, they may look the same to your perceptual system, but your brain can automatically calculate which one is more threatening and trigger a dodging motion before you`ve even realized what has happened.
"If you look at the shoe-throwing video you will see that the prime minister doesn`t flinch at all. His brain has already categorized the shoe as non-threatening which does not require evasive action. But Bush`s brain has categorized the shoe as threatening and triggers an evasive dodge, all within a fraction of a second," said Lin.
The researchers set up several experiments to determine how this dual visual system works. They say that their experiments were similar to what baseball players experience when they step into the batter`s box, and get ready for the pitcher to throw the ball.
The team points out that in a split second, the player’s action system determines whether the ball is going to hit their body, and whether to initiate a defensive bail out of the batter``s box.
However, rather than making college students play baseball, the researchers asked them to look at a computer monitor, and quickly locate a target oval among a field of circular discs. The subjects would press a key when they found the oval.
The key manipulation in the study was that some of the trials began with a looming stimulus at the position of the target oval. When this looming motion was on a collision path with a student``s head, the participant responded faster to the target than when the looming motion just missed the head.
The researchers observed that a stimulus on a collision path with a student captured attention, but one on a near-miss path did not.
Co-authors are Scott Murray and Geoffrey Boynton, UW psychology assistant and associate professors, respectively.
Critically, the subjects could not differentiate between the subtly different collision and near-miss looming stimuli in a separate experiment.
The researchers say that their study supports the idea that the human visual system is composed of two independent systems.
"A major focus of neuroscience is understanding how we deal with sensory information. There is no way the brain can possibly process and analyze everything we are exposed to. We have to select what is important. In the real world you are on your own and what you pay attention to is part of survival. This experiment shows that threatening stimuli grab your attention, even those we can`t consciously identify. That this is more accurate than our conscious perception is pretty amazing," said co-author Geoffrey Boynton.
ANI
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookies Setting
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and the processing of information obtained via those cookies (including about your preferences, device and online activity) by us and our commercial partners to enhance site navigation, personalise ads, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. More information can be found in our Cookies and Privacy Policy. You can amend your cookie settings to reject non-essential cookies by clicking Cookie Settings below.
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work or you may not be able to login.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advert as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we may not know when you have visited our site, and may not be able to monitor its performance.