We are a democratic institution, not one-man show: AITA
New Delhi: AITA on Wednesday dismissed Mahesh Bhupathi`s allegation that the national federation is run by only one man and asserted that it was a "democratic" institution.
AITA`s executive committee had last week imposed two-year bans on Bhupathi and Rohan Bopanna for not abiding by the selection committee`s decision ahead of the London Olympics.
But Bhupathi, in a scathing press conference on Tuesday in Mumbai, said that it was AITA president Anil Khanna, who takes all the decision and hides behind the committees.
AITA on Wednesday issued a press release on behalf of its executive committee members, who say that they were not stooges to Khanna.
According to the release the members felt that it is "an insult" to them who have been serving in the executive committee with commitment and "debate" each and every point on the agenda.
"This is far from being correct. AITA is most professionally managed organisation and has four Executive Directors who are well qualified to head the different departments of AITA."
"..Each of the Chairmen of the six Committees is a highly respected person with experience in Education, Government, Journalism and Administration.
"AITA is one of the most democratic institutions and has been headed between 2000-2012 by Mr Yashwant Sinha, MP, former Finance Minister and External Affairs Minister. The Life Presidents of AITA are Shri S M Krishna, External Affairs Minister and Shri Yashwant Sinha.
"The Vice Presidents of AITA includes very distinguished personalities who would not chose to be part of an organisation which is not transparent and democratic," an AITA release said.
The executive committee also stood by the decision to ban Bhupathi and Bopanna and said it was taken by a majority, and added that Khanna actually was in minority in this case.
"The Committee would also like to state that it has the highest respect for the tennis credentials of Mr Mahesh Bhupathi and Mr Rohan Bopanna but at the same time the Committee feels that the action taken under Rule 36 (a) (ii) is the correct action taken under the constitution to ensure discipline.
"The Ethics Committee and Executive Committee have also given an opportunity to the two players to make an appeal. Contrary to the impression that was sought to be created, consequent to Mahesh Bhupathi`s press conference, that Mr Anil Khanna is responsible for this decision, this is to clarify that the decision in respect of the two players was taken by the Executive Committee of AITA which was attended by 12 representatives from different states of India on recommendation of a 4 member Ethics Committee of AITA.
"This note is therefore sent on request of executive committee members who feel that unwarranted insinuations are made on the president of AITA and thereby implying that others are his stooges.
"....A unanimous decision or a majority decision does not mean that it is taken by Mr. Khanna only. The fact in this case is that unfortunately he was in minority in this decision and he had to go with the majority opinion and had to agree with it," the released stated.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- DNA : When will Indian govt take strong actions against terrorism?
- Drunk girl assaults Mumbai police in Worli
- Arun Jaitley upset with Subramaniam Swami's Twitter attack
- Bombay HC to pronounce verdict on entry of woman to Haji Ali Dargah today
- DNA: When will Indian govt take strong actions against terrorism? - Part II
- Three new suicide attacks in Lebanon village near Syria
- Preparing for Brexit, Britain may see new PM by early September
- US says India has shown sustained commitment to non-proliferation
- Earthquake shakes southern Mexico, felt in capital
- Turkey mends fences with Israel and Russia in foreign policy reset