Advertisement
Ask fare committee to decide Mumbai Metro fares: HC to Centre
The Bombay High Court Tuesday asked the Centre to direct the fare fixation committee to expeditiously fix the tariff of the 11.4-km Mumbai Metro rail corridor which connects Versova in the west to Ghatkopar in the east.
)
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court Tuesday asked the Centre to direct the fare fixation committee to expeditiously fix the tariff of the 11.4-km Mumbai Metro rail corridor which connects Versova in the west to Ghatkopar in the east.
All the partners in the consortium are members of the fare fixation committee which has been asked to decide the fares of the Metro which became operational this month.
Justice R D Dhanuka also rejected the petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) challenging the fares of the Metro.
At present, Mumbai Metro One Private Ltd (MMOPL) is offering a promotional fare of Rs 10 for all the destinations till July 9.
MMRDA, a state agency, and Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure, both of which are part of MMOPL, have a disagreement over the fares.
While the state government wants minimum fare of Rs 9 and maximum fare of Rs 13 for the rail corridor, its operator MMOPL has announced higher fares ranging between Rs 10 and Rs 40.
According to MMRDA, fares had been decided collectively by all the stake-holders earlier and RInfra cannot change them unilaterally without following a due procedure.
The court held that the arbitration tribunal would decide on the validity and legality of a resolution passed by MMOPL, which is running the Metro, fixing the fares.
However, the arbitrators are yet to be appointed for this purpose. The court had asked the parties to suggest names of arbitrators. However, they have not arrived at any consensus on the names of arbitrators to form a tribunal.
The judge was of the view that the agreement between the parties of the consortium which had built the Metro was in conflict with the Metro Act.
"The project is not set up for private profit. It is a joint project by the public and the private sector for the people. Therefore, they cannot raise the fares arbitrarily," MMRDA counsel E P Bharucha argued.
Fares can be revised only after a nod from fare fixation committee, he said.
Reliance Infrastructure argued that fares decided by the government had been imposed on the company.
"We are much cheaper compared to the fares of BEST municipal buses and the Railways. The bus fare on the same route (between Versova and Ghatkopar) is Rs 25. One has to pay Rs 60 for an air-conditioned bus, Rs 163 for an auto, Rs 204 for a taxi. We charge only Rs 40," its lawyer Iqbal Chhagla argued.
All the partners in the consortium are members of the fare fixation committee which has been asked to decide the fares of the Metro which became operational this month.
Justice R D Dhanuka also rejected the petition filed by Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) challenging the fares of the Metro.
At present, Mumbai Metro One Private Ltd (MMOPL) is offering a promotional fare of Rs 10 for all the destinations till July 9.
MMRDA, a state agency, and Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure, both of which are part of MMOPL, have a disagreement over the fares.
While the state government wants minimum fare of Rs 9 and maximum fare of Rs 13 for the rail corridor, its operator MMOPL has announced higher fares ranging between Rs 10 and Rs 40.
According to MMRDA, fares had been decided collectively by all the stake-holders earlier and RInfra cannot change them unilaterally without following a due procedure.
The court held that the arbitration tribunal would decide on the validity and legality of a resolution passed by MMOPL, which is running the Metro, fixing the fares.
However, the arbitrators are yet to be appointed for this purpose. The court had asked the parties to suggest names of arbitrators. However, they have not arrived at any consensus on the names of arbitrators to form a tribunal.
The judge was of the view that the agreement between the parties of the consortium which had built the Metro was in conflict with the Metro Act.
"The project is not set up for private profit. It is a joint project by the public and the private sector for the people. Therefore, they cannot raise the fares arbitrarily," MMRDA counsel E P Bharucha argued.
Fares can be revised only after a nod from fare fixation committee, he said.
Reliance Infrastructure argued that fares decided by the government had been imposed on the company.
"We are much cheaper compared to the fares of BEST municipal buses and the Railways. The bus fare on the same route (between Versova and Ghatkopar) is Rs 25. One has to pay Rs 60 for an air-conditioned bus, Rs 163 for an auto, Rs 204 for a taxi. We charge only Rs 40," its lawyer Iqbal Chhagla argued.
Stay informed on all the latest news, real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in india news and world News on Zee News.
