- News>
- Archives
Absence of strong suspicion let Advani off the hook
Rae Bareli, Sept 21: While giving Deputy Prime Minister L K Advani the benefit of doubt in Babri Masjid demolition case, the special court here relied heavily on the statements of the witnesses with regard to his role which the court felt were of conflicting nature, thereby not creating a `strong suspicion` that he was involved in the offences.
Rae Bareli, Sept 21: While giving Deputy Prime Minister L K Advani the benefit of doubt in Babri Masjid demolition case, the special court here relied heavily on the statements of the witnesses with regard to his role which the court felt were of conflicting nature, thereby not creating a "strong suspicion" that he was involved in the offences.
In his 130-page order, special judicial magistrate V K Singh, while finding "enough grounds for discharging" Advani, has said the evidence presented against the other seven accused create a "strong suspicion" about their involvement in the offences.
In reaching its decision, the court has cited a Supreme Court ruling in union of India vs. Prafulla Kumar Sama and others case in which the apex court opined that if the court was satisfied that there could be two equal viewpoints and the evidence presented though create "some amount of suspicion but not serious suspicion the accused could be discharged".
It will be reasonable to frame charges if the evidence create serious suspicion against the accused and has not been explained, the court observed. Quoting extensively from statements of the witnesses with regard to Advani, the magistrate said, "After considering the arguments and evidence, I am of the opinion that there appears two view points with regard to the charges against Advani. According to one view point, he committed the crime while another view point says that he did not." "In my opinion, there is merely a suspicion and not a strong suspicion that he (Advani) did commit the crime," he said.
Bureau Report
It will be reasonable to frame charges if the evidence create serious suspicion against the accused and has not been explained, the court observed. Quoting extensively from statements of the witnesses with regard to Advani, the magistrate said, "After considering the arguments and evidence, I am of the opinion that there appears two view points with regard to the charges against Advani. According to one view point, he committed the crime while another view point says that he did not." "In my opinion, there is merely a suspicion and not a strong suspicion that he (Advani) did commit the crime," he said.
Bureau Report