- News>
- India
SC upholds two child norm for Haryana sarpanchs
New Delhi, July 30: In a major ruling that could pave the way for enforcement of family planning norms for legislators, the Supreme Court today upheld a Haryana legislation barring a village panchayat member from becoming the `Sarpanch` or `Up-Sarpanch` if he had more than two children.
New Delhi, July 30: In a major ruling that could pave the way for enforcement of family planning norms for legislators, the Supreme Court today upheld a Haryana legislation barring a village panchayat member from becoming the 'Sarpanch' or 'Up-Sarpanch' if he had more than two children.
Rejecting the plea of Muslim village panchayat members
that two-child norm was violative of their right to freedom of
religion, a bench comprising Justice R C Lahoti, Justice Ashok
Bhan and Justice Arun Kumar said the legislation did not
violate articles 14 (right to equality), 21 (right to life and
liberty) and 25 (freedom of religion) of the Constitution.
In all, the bench dismissed over 200 petitions filed by sarpanchs, upsarpanchs and village panchayat members challenging the Haryana Panchayatiraj (Amendment) Act, 1994 which brought in the two-child norm for those heading the panchayats and their deputies. The unanimous judgement was written by Justice Lahoti.
To escape the disqualification, many of the sarpanchs and deputy sarpanchs, who had more than two children, had given their children in adoption to their relatives.
Nullifying the effect of such adoption, Justice Lahoti said once the disqualification has been incurred by the sarpanch or the upsarpanch, he or she could not escape the consequences by giving the children in excess of two to other relatives in adoption. Bureau Report
In all, the bench dismissed over 200 petitions filed by sarpanchs, upsarpanchs and village panchayat members challenging the Haryana Panchayatiraj (Amendment) Act, 1994 which brought in the two-child norm for those heading the panchayats and their deputies. The unanimous judgement was written by Justice Lahoti.
To escape the disqualification, many of the sarpanchs and deputy sarpanchs, who had more than two children, had given their children in adoption to their relatives.
Nullifying the effect of such adoption, Justice Lahoti said once the disqualification has been incurred by the sarpanch or the upsarpanch, he or she could not escape the consequences by giving the children in excess of two to other relatives in adoption. Bureau Report