Suffering from chronic pain? Try Tai Chi, suggests study

(Representational image)

New Delhi: Numerous studies have often linked Tai Chi – an art practiced for defense training – to various health benefits.

Adding to the list, a new study has associated Tai Chi with chronic pain saying that the ancient martial art form is as good as or even better than aerobic exercise for managing chronic pain.

Tai Chi, which has been used for more than 1,000 years, combines deep breathing and slow and gentle movements.

It is generally suitable for people of any level of physical fitness.

Fibromyalgia affects around 2-4% of the adult population worldwide and is a long-term condition that causes widespread body pain.

It may also lead to extreme tiredness, muscle stiffness, difficulty sleeping, and depression.

While aerobic exercise is recommended, at present, as standard treatment, many patients find it difficult to exercise due to fluctuations in symptoms.

Some trials have suggested that Tai Chi alleviates pain and improves physical and mental health in patients with fibromyalgia but concluded that larger and more rigorous trials are needed to confirm the results.

So to investigate further, a team of US researchers set out to compare the effectiveness of Tai Chi with aerobic exercise and to test whether this depends on its frequency or duration.

They identified 226 adults with fibromyalgia who had not participated in Tai Chi or other similar types of complementary and alternative medicine within the past six months.

The average age of participants was 52 years, 92% were women, 61% were white, and an average duration of body pain was nine years.

At the start of the trial, participants completed the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR), which scores physical and psychological symptoms such as pain intensity, physical function, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and overall wellbeing.

Participants were then randomly assigned to either supervised aerobic exercise twice weekly for 24 weeks or to one of four Tai Chi interventions: 12 or 24 weeks of supervised Tai Chi completed once or twice weekly.

Changes in symptom scores were assessed at 12, 24 and 52 weeks and participants were able to continue routine drugs and usual visits to their physicians throughout the trial.

FIQR scores improved in all five treatment groups at each assessment, but the combined Tai Chi groups improved significantly more than the aerobic exercise group at 24 weeks.

Tai Chi also showed greater benefit when compared with aerobic exercise of the same intensity and duration (twice weekly for 24 weeks).

Those who received Tai Chi for 24 weeks showed greater improvements than those who received it for 12 weeks, but there was no significant increase in benefit for those who received Tai Chi twice weekly compared with once weekly.

The effects of Tai Chi were consistent across all instructors and no serious adverse events related to the interventions were reported.

The findings also remained largely unchanged after further analyses to test the strength of the results.

The researchers point to several study limitations. For example, participants were aware of their treatment group assignment, and attendance differed between the two treatment groups, both of which could have influenced the results. However, key strengths include the large and diverse sample and longer follow-up than previous studies.

"Tai Chi mind-body treatment results in similar or greater improvement in symptoms than aerobic exercise, the current most commonly prescribed non-drug treatment, for a variety of outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia," write the authors.

"This mind-body approach may be considered a therapeutic option in the multidisciplinary management of fibromyalgia," they conclude.

The study appears in The BMJ.

(With ANI inputs)