- News>
- India
Sajjan, Tytler and Katna issued notice by Nanavati Commission
New Delhi, Nov 25: The Nanavati Commission probing the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, has issued notices to 25 persons including senior Congress leader Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish Tytler and Delhi Police Joint Commissioner U K Katna asking them to produce evidence in their defence.
New Delhi, Nov 25: The Nanavati Commission probing
the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, has issued notices to 25 persons
including senior Congress leader Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish
Tytler and Delhi Police Joint Commissioner U K Katna asking
them to produce evidence in their defence.
Justice G T Nanavati issued notices to them under Section
8-B of the Commission of inquiry act asking them to reply by
December 8 as their reputation was likely to be "prejudicially
affected" by the inquiry report.
The notices were issued to those persons and police
officials against whom the witnesses from north and West Delhi
gave evidence on record, Commission's Official A K Chaturvedi
said.
The witnesses have alleged that Tytler and Kumar had led
and instigated the mob in killing and destroying the property
of Sikhs while Katna has been accused of dereliction of duty
as the DCP (West) during the riots.
The other Congress leaders who have been asked to respond
to the notice are Ram Chandra Nagoria, Ram Lal, Tarvinder
Singh Bedi, Hardwari Lal, Brhamanand Gupta and Nathu Pradhan.
The notices were also issued to then ACP (North) R S Mallik and SHO Mongolpuri R S Dahiya, who is now posted as ACP (Crime).
The Commission has already completed the recording of of evidence and is supposed to issue notices to all those persons whose reputation, in its opinion, was likely to be prejudicially affected by the inquiry.
Bureau Report
The notices were also issued to then ACP (North) R S Mallik and SHO Mongolpuri R S Dahiya, who is now posted as ACP (Crime).
The Commission has already completed the recording of of evidence and is supposed to issue notices to all those persons whose reputation, in its opinion, was likely to be prejudicially affected by the inquiry.
Bureau Report