trendingNowenglish2535393https://zeenews.india.com/india/maharastra-sena-leader-in-hc-against-delimitation-of-bmc-wards-by-eknath-government-2535393.html
News> India
Advertisement

Maharastra: Sena leader in HC against delimitation of BMC wards by Eknath government

Raju Pednekar, who was a former BMC councillor has challenged the August 2022 ordinance claiming that it sought to turn back the clock. He did this through his lawyer Joel Carlos.

Maharastra: Sena leader in HC against delimitation of BMC wards by Eknath government Image Credit: ANI; Representational Image

Mumbai: A former councillor on Monday moved the Bombay High Court against an ordinance issued by the Eknath Shinde-led Maharashtra government reducing the number of directly elected councillors within the limits of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) from 236 to 227. In November 2021, the Maha Vikas Aghadi government led by Uddhav Thackeray decided to increase the number of wards from 227 to 236. However, in August, the Shiv Sena-BJP government issued an ordinance bringing back to number to 227. Former BMC councillor Raju Pednekar, through his lawyer Joel Carlos, on Monday challenged the August 2022 ordinance, claiming that it sought to put the clock back.

Increased population was proportionately represented in the BMC

The petition will be heard on November 16 by a division bench of Justices R D Dhanuka and Kamal Khata. The petitioner pointed out that to ensure the increased population was proportionately represented in the BMC, the previous state government had decided that the number of directly elected councillors would be increased by nine, bringing the number to 236. This was then challenged before the High Court, which proceeded to dismiss the petitions. The court held that the increase in the number of councillors was proportionate to the rise in population based on the 2011 census.

Also Read: No RELIEF for Partha Chatterjee: Court REJECTS bail plea of Mamata Banerjee's ex-Minister again, will stay in jail till THIS date

This was upheld by the Supreme Court. Despite this, the present state government reversed the earlier cabinet decision, the plea said. The ordinance under challenge is ex-facie illegal and unconstitutional, as it purports to defeat and nullify the orders of the Supreme Court, the petition stated. The BMC elections are already overdue by more than six months and if the ordinance does not stay, then the State Election Commission will not be able to conduct the polls, it said.

Stay informed on all the latest news, real-time breaking news updates, and follow all the important headlines in india news and world News on Zee News.

Read More
NEWS ON ONE CLICK