Drop in CO2 triggered polar ice sheet formation
Zeenews
       English        
Sunday, May 27, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Eco News

Drop in CO2 triggered polar ice sheet formation

Last Updated: Friday, December 02, 2011, 12:28
Comments 6  
Drop in CO2 triggered polar ice sheet formation Washington: A drop in carbon dioxide (CO2) levels seems to have triggered Antarctic ice sheet formation.

Scientists from Yale and Purdue Universities stumbled on the discovery while examining molecules from ancient algae found in deep-sea core samples.

Matthew Huber, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Purdue, said roughly a 40 percent decrease in CO2 occurred prior to and during the rapid formation of a mile-thick ice sheet over the Antarctic approximately 34 million years ago.

"We went from a warm world without ice to a cooler world with an ice sheet overnight, in geologic terms, because of fluctuations in carbon dioxide levels," he added, the Science journal reported.

For 100 million years prior to the cooling, which occurred at the end of the Eocene epoch, earth was warm and wet. Mammals and even reptiles and amphibians inhabited the North and South poles, which then had subtropical climates.

Then, over a span of about 100,000 years, temperatures fell dramatically, many species of animals became extinct, ice covered Antarctica and sea levels fell as the Oligocene epoch began, according to a Yale and Purdue statement.

Mark Pagani, the Yale geochemist who led the study, said polar ice sheets and sea ice exert a strong control on modern climate, influencing the global circulation of warm and cold air masses, precipitation patterns and wind strengths, and regulating global and regional temperature variability.

"The onset of Antarctic ice is the mother of all climate 'tipping points,'" he said. "Recognising the primary role carbon dioxide change played in altering global climate is a fundamentally important observation."

IANS

First Published: Friday, December 02, 2011, 12:28

Comments

Jiggidy - Santa Barbara
Yale and Purdue? Listen to these elitist scientists talk about a subject they have studied their entire lives. I watch Glenn Beck and he explained to me this is all a left wing biased scare tactic. Cmon people! Who you going to listen to? Scientists talking about science or entertainers on the TV?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
229Mick - The United States of America
Wait, no one taxed em and C02 levels still dropped? Unbelievable! What waws solar activity like???
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
AGW Denier - Brisbane
``because of fluctuations in carbon dioxide levels``....how is that conclusion arrived at, exactly?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Jiggidy - Santa Barbara
Its done through a process of pulling ice samples dated from certain time periods. The ice samples are melted in a machine that catches the gases releasesd by the ice and the gases are measured. Im not sure what the technique is called but it works. God bless you Discovery Channel!
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Robert Mirowski - New York City, New York
It`s a good thing that the polar regins was much warmer because that means there was more animals that had more living space to help more animals to give birth which means when they die and decay more fossil fuel is made which helped our human civilazation to develope higher technology. 100 years ago we had no probes exploring our solar system. But thanks to our much tecnology we are lauching probes to find out where we can live on Planet Mars. Eventully we will develope intersteller engines and we will find other planets to live at in other solar systems. Because our planet can only take care of just so many people.
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
JohnK. - Idaho
This is silly. It ignores one critical fact of what was going on with the Earth 34 million years ago which was the opening of the Drake Passage between Antarctica and South America. It ignores the actual change to the Earth and only correlates two effects that were caused by a susbtantial change in geography. it is exactly backwards science like this that drives people to be skeptical about global warming. http://theinconvenientskeptic.com/2011/04/the-failure-of-gcms-in-the-evolution-of-antarctica/
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
JamesL - Oregon
Yeah, except the Drake Passage opened up 41 million years ago and not 34 million years ago. And also, the opening of the drake passage would NOT have caused massive ice sheet formation of the antartic. Do you know anything about SCIENCE???
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Darr247 - USA
So now we`re at the other side of the pendulum`s swing, and we can look forward to 100 million years of warmer weather. Yay. I can hardly wait for the seas/oceans to start burping up the H2S when they warm enough that oxygen in them becomes depleted. Watch for it to happen around the Dead Sea, first.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
AGW Denier - Los Angeles
You mean, the CO2 fluctuation existed before modern fossil burning society? Say it ain`t so!
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
boohoo - San Francisco
OH Noooooooo!!! Quick, hide the incline
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

AGW Denier - Los Angeles
You mean, the CO2 fluctuation existed before modern fossil burning society? Say it ain`t so!



JohnK. - Idaho
This is silly. It ignores one critical fact of what was going on with the Earth 34 million years ago which was the opening of the Drake Passage between Antarctica and South America. It ignores the actual change to the Earth and only correlates two effects that were caused by a susbtantial change in geography. it is exactly backwards science like this that drives people to be skeptical about global warming. http://theinconvenientskeptic.com/2011/04/the-failure-of-gcms-in-the-evolution-of-antarctica/



229Mick - The United States of America
Wait, no one taxed em and C02 levels still dropped? Unbelievable! What waws solar activity like???