Australia`s richest person Gina Rinehart loses media source case
Australia`s richest person Gina Rinehart has lost a long-running legal bid to force a media group to hand over their source material in a messy dispute over her family`s mining fortune.
|Last Updated: Aug 07, 2013, 06:25 PM IST|Source: Bureau
Sydney: Australia`s richest person Gina Rinehart has lost a long-running legal bid to force a media group to hand over their source material in a messy dispute over her family`s mining fortune.
Rinehart had been trying to force West Australian Newspapers to surrender all letters, faxes, emails, legal advice, memos, text messages and recordings between their journalist Steve Pennells and her son, John Hancock.
Hancock and his sister Bianca Rinehart are embroiled in acrimonious legal proceedings with their mother, an iron ore heiress with an estimated Aus$22 billion (US$20 billion) fortune, over a family trust established by their prospector grandfather Lang Hancock.
Pennells published a series of exclusive articles over the imbroglio and Rinehart subpoenaed him and the West Australian newspaper to produce its source material in an almost two-year legal battle.
But the state`s Supreme Court tossed out Rinehart`s application in a judgement late Tuesday by judge Janine Pritchard.
"WAN`s application to set aside the subpoena should be upheld in part, on the ground that the subpoena is oppressive and constitutes an abuse of process," Pritchard said in her judgment.
Editor Brett McCarthy said it was a win for the newspaper and for journalism, being the first test of Western Australia`s new "shield laws" protecting journalists from revealing their sources.
"The judge carefully weighed up the rights of our journalist Steve Pennells to maintain a confidential source against the rights of a litigant to have that source revealed and found in our favour," said McCarthy.
Australia`s journalists` union welcomed the decision and said it was "outrageous that, even with shield laws in place, Steve Pennells was forced through a very lengthy, expensive and stressful series of court procedures before this decision reiterated the position of the law".
"The court`s decision underscores the need to acknowledge and respect journalist privilege in relation to the journalists` ethical requirement to refuse to disclose their confidential sources," said union secretary Chris Warren.
"But it is a principle that still needs to be properly enshrined in (national) law."
Another journalist, Fairfax`s Adele Ferguson, is awaiting verdict on a similar bid for source material by Rinehart relating to her unauthorised biography about the outspoken mining baroness who made waves with a series of share splurges in media companies last year.
"I think it is a great win for journalism and press freedom," said Ferguson of the Pennells ruling.
"The judgment was strong and made it clear that sources should be protected and journalistic ethics respected."
AFP
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookies Setting
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and the processing of information obtained via those cookies (including about your preferences, device and online activity) by us and our commercial partners to enhance site navigation, personalise ads, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. More information can be found in our Cookies and Privacy Policy. You can amend your cookie settings to reject non-essential cookies by clicking Cookie Settings below.
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work or you may not be able to login.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advert as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we may not know when you have visited our site, and may not be able to monitor its performance.