Supreme Court dismissed petition by ADG of Gujarat Police PP Pandey challenging state high court`s order by which it had handed over to the CBI investigation into Ishrat Jahan killing.
|Last Updated: Jul 12, 2013, 07:53 PM IST|Source: Bureau
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition by the Additional Director General of Gujarat Police PP Pandey challenging the state high court`s order by which it had handed over to the CBI the investigation into Ishrat Jahan and her associates` staged shootout killing.
The court also directed the registration of a fresh First Information Report (FIR).
Holding that the high court order had been challenged two years after it was passed December 01, 2011, and the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, the apex court bench of Justice Gyan Sudha Misra and Justice Kurian Joseph said it was not a fit petition to be entertained.
Pronouncing the order, Justice Misra said there were numerous instances wherein high courts, upon finding that the investigation by the state police was not being carried out satisfactorily, had handed the probe to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and ordered the registration of a fresh FIR.
It is not "uncommon and unknown to law for the high court to handover the investigation into a case to CBI if, in its opinion, the facts of the case justified it", said the court pronouncing its order.
Rejecting Pandey`s plea, the court further noted that there was no valid or justified contention that the matter should not have been handed over to the CBI.
Having said this, Justice Misra referred to the Nithari case, pointing out that after the matter was first investigated by the Uttar Pradesh Police, it was handed over to the CBI.
Nithari in Uttar Pradesh, a village bordering Delhi, made international headlines in 2006, when the skeletons of apparently murdered women and children were recovered. A businessman and his servant were sentenced to death in the case.
Rejecting the plea that long delay in filing the petition challenging December 01, 2011, order of the High court was because Pandey was not a party to the case, the court said that he could have impleaded himself in the case before the high court after he was named in the second FIR as one of the accused.
Rejection of Pandey`s plea has further compounded his woes, as the trial court has already declared him an absconder since he has so far evaded arrest.
Ishrat Jahan and her three associates were killed in a staged shootout by Gujarat Police on June 15, 2004 after an input by the Intelligence Bureau that the operatives of Lashkar-e-Toiba were heading towards Gujarat to kill Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
IANS
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Cookies Setting
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device and the processing of information obtained via those cookies (including about your preferences, device and online activity) by us and our commercial partners to enhance site navigation, personalise ads, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. More information can be found in our Cookies and Privacy Policy. You can amend your cookie settings to reject non-essential cookies by clicking Cookie Settings below.
Manage Consent Preferences
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work or you may not be able to login.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advert as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we may not know when you have visited our site, and may not be able to monitor its performance.