`No progress` in peace talks: Syrian foes
Geneva: A fresh round of UN-brokered peace talks between Syria`s government and opposition has made no progress, the two sides said on Friday.
"We deeply regret that this round did not make any progress," Syria`s deputy foreign minister, Faisal Muqdad told reporters as both sides traded blame over the deadlock in the Geneva talks, the second round of which began Monday.
Speaking separately just minutes earlier, opposition spokesman Louay Safi complained about the other side`s failure to budge.
"The negotiations have reached an impasse," Safi said.
"If this situation does not change... It means that the negotiations are not moving towards a political solution. We are now awaiting serious progress."
As they did during the debut round of talks in January, the Syrian foes have spent this week wrangling over what should come top of the agenda, blocking all negotiation.
The opposition insists peace talks must centre on Syria`s political transition from one-party rule under President Bashar al-Assad.
But government negotiators have refused to discuss a 24-point plan by the opposition to craft a transition body to halt violence and pave the way for elections.
The regime side, which insists Assad`s future cannot be up for debate, wants the talks to focus on "terrorism" -- the label applied to the three-year revolt, which it says has been fuelled by foreign jihadists and Gulf money.
But when pressed by reporters over whether there was a difference between the jihadist militias and the likes of the moderate Free Syrian Army, Muqdad was unequivocal that they are part and parcel of the same problem.
"Those who carry arms against their people and government are terrorists," he said.
The opposition rejects such arguments hands down.
It underlines that the Free Syrian Army is itself battling al Qaeda-linked fighters, and has spotlighted regime inaction against the jihadists and even alleged complicity.
It also accuses the regime of terrorism due to its tactic of raining "barrel bombs" onto opposition-held communities, and of deploying fighters from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah, classed as a terrorist group in the West.
"We have no problem discussing terrorism. Terrorism has been instigated by the regime," Safi said.
More from India
More from World
More from Sports
More from Entertaiment
- Panel discussion on clashes at JNU over Afzal Guru row
- JNU students call terrorist Afzal Guru a martyr amid anti-nationalist slogans
- DNA: JNU students clash over Afzal Guru row
- Panel discussion on clashes at JNU over Afzal Guru row- Part II
- PM Modi breaks protocol to receive Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Al Nahyan
- Drunk girl creates ruckus in Delhi's Connaught Place; arrested - Watch
- JNU erupts over 'Shaheed Afzal Guru', 'Azad Kashmir'; rival student groups clash, police deployed
- AAP poster showing Arvind Kejriwal with Bhindranwale sparks row in Punjab
- Video of Hanumanthappa's rescue that went viral on social media is fake - Watch
- Digangana Suryavanshi chops off her mane on Salman Khan's advice—See pics!