2G stand-off: Sibal reminds BJP of Tehelka episode
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

2G stand-off: Sibal reminds BJP of Tehelka episode

Last Updated: Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 21:43
Comments 1  
New Delhi: With Opposition continuing to stall Parliament, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal on Tuesday sought to remind BJP of the Tehelka expose during NDA regime, saying the Congress had then agreed to have a debate instead of being adamant on the JPC demand.

"BJP should ask itself the question...when NDA was in power and Tehalka episode took place, we stalled proceedings in Parliament for a while and sought a JPC. Please ask the NDA and the BJP to find out what their Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpaye said," he said.

"He (Vajpayee) said at that time that please have a debate in the House and after the debate is over, we will see whether the demand for JPC is valid or not. We did not continue to stall the House. We had a debate in the House," Sibal recalled about the events of 2000.

Sibal was talking to reporters on the sidelines of Jamia Millia University's annual convocation ceremony here.

Criticising BJP for being adamant on its demand for a JPC probe into the alleged 2G scam, Sibal said nothing has changed between now and then except that the BJP is in Opposition and the Congress is in power.

He was referring to the Tehelka sting operation in which BJP President Bangaru Laxman was allegedly caught accepting bribe. He was later forced to resign.

"When they were in power they wanted a debate in the House and when they are in opposition they oppose a debate in the House. People of India should know the kind of ideology and principles they follow," Sibal said.

PTI

First Published: Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 21:43

Comments

mohanrao - Hyderabad
``When they were in power they wanted a debate in the House and when they are in opposition they oppose a debate in the House. People of India should know the kind of ideology and principles they follow,`` Sibal said.

I fail to comprehend the logic from an eminent lawyer. Because someone got away with murder, it does not give you licence to commit similar indiscretion and rationalise to get immunity as one had got away earlier!. Further as times change, and scams proliferate, and continuasly evade exposure and on the contrary get encouraged and promoted, it is futile to repose trust on the rulers who are thriving on sharing the spoils without any scruples or morals.
A different and effective stance may need due to the changed scenario. Though I am not a lawyer, possibly because of this deficiency, I was unable to understand the rationale of the statement on the quotes given above and seek enlightenment.

Sibals argument appears fallacious and unconvincing.

Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments