Probe graft charges against Balakrishnan: SC
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Sunday, May 26, 2013 
Search
Nation

Probe graft charges against Balakrishnan: SC

Last Updated: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 11:42     A- A A+
Comments 5
Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the competent authority of Centre to look into allegation of misconduct against former chief justice Balakrishnan, who is currently the chairman of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

Refusing to direct Centre for presidential reference against Balakrishnan, the apex court bench if Justices BS Chauhan and JS Khehar said the matter needs to be decided by the President on advice of Council of Ministers.

The court asked the Centre to take a decision on a representation by the Committee on Judicial Accountability (CJA) seeking a presidential reference on the allegation of misconduct against NHRC chairman KG Balakrishnan when he was chief justice of India.

The court had taken up the matter after a PIL was been filed by civil society Common Cause alleging ex-CJI and his relative amassed wealth far exceeding their legal income during Balakrishnan's tenure at the Supreme Court.

Common Cause, in its petition, has annexed media reports as documents to buttress its allegations that 'benami' properties were acquired by Balakrishnan's kin during his tenure.

Pronouncing the judgement, Justice Khehar said if the government found that the allegation against the former chief justice of India was unworthy of being proceeded against then it would inform Common Cause, accordingly.

However, the court said if the government decides in favour of the representation by the CJA, then it would proceed into the matter as mandated Under Section 5 (2) of the National Human Rights Commission Act.

The court issued directions to the government citing the "peculiar sets and circumstances" of the case.

The Supreme Court had Monday reserved its order on the petition. Besides allegations of misconduct against Justice Balakrishnan, it has also been alleged in the public suit that his two sons-in-law and brother amassed wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income during his tenure in the Supreme Court.

Justice Balakrishnan was elevated as a Supreme Court judge in June 2000 and appointed the Chief Justice of India on January 14, 2007. He retired on May 12, 2010 after which he was appointed NHRC chairman.

With Agency Inputs

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 11:02

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI............INDIA
HE IS NOT A CLERK OTHERWISE HE WOULD HAVE BEEN RAIDED............VIP`s AND.,OFFICERS ARE NOT RAIDED ..........BUT PROTECTED....
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
BRIJ - NEWYORK
WHY SC DID NOT TAKE THE CASE WHEN HE IS KNOWN CORRUPT, IS IT BROTHERHOOD OF JUDICIARY OR CONTROL OF CONGRESS .
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
vijay - new zealand
Anybody is innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
RAGHAVENDRA R PAWAR - BANGALORE
This is not fair and if doesn’t want to confidential document to be made public should appeal to the court to not to disclose quoting the national secutiry reasons. People of this country eagerly watching this issue to know that who is right and wrong more than that really kickback has been offered and still prevailed in the era of spirited citizens fighting for greater trasparancy and accountability in the government.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Partha - Pune
The Supreme Court`s image has long been sullied.It is only because of few no non-sense CJs like Justice Kapadia,YK Sabharwal the image is somehow intact.These politicians didn`t leave Mr Sabharwal unscathed.They targeted him heavily after his retirement and filed false cases.I don`t know what is in store for Mr Kapadia after retirement.Justices and people like KGB are always detrimental to any organization they work with.They will simply finish the ethics their,because they have no sense of ethics and needless to mention ,no self respect either.Please note down KGB is a congress man ,if at all the image of someone or something is sullied,it is the congress party`s who made this guy the CJ and now he is made the chairman of National Human Rights Commission.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI............INDIA
HE IS NOT A CLERK OTHERWISE HE WOULD HAVE BEEN RAIDED............VIP`s AND.,OFFICERS ARE NOT RAIDED ..........BUT PROTECTED....



Top News



latest