Thomas wants stay on new CVC appointment
Zeenews
       English        
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 
Search
Follwo us on: Facebook Follwo us on: Twiter RSS Mail to us Mail to us Mail to us
Nation

Thomas wants stay on new CVC appointment

Last Updated: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 17:56
Comments 6  
Thomas wants stay on new CVC appointment New Delhi: P J Thomas, whose appointment as CVC was cancelled by President Pratibha Patil after the Supreme Court held it as illegal, has moved the Delhi High Court seeking stay of the appointment of his successor who is being sworn in on Thursday.

In his writ petition filed yesterday, Thomas sought a direction to the President not to issue any warrant of appointment as Chief Vigilance Commissioner(CVC) to Defence Secretary Pradeep Kumar without first deciding on his representation to her against the judgement of the Supreme Court.

Thomas in his representation to the President on March 16 had requested her to refer the decision of the Apex Court to a Constitution Bench.

The President cancelled Thomas's appointment as Central CVC on March 15, 11 days after the apex court order.

Pradeep Kumar(62) will be sworn-in as the new CVC by President Patil at a ceremony in Rashtrapati Bhavan tomorrow.

"The main ground(in the HC petition) is that the decision was delivered by a three-judge bench. We are supporting the mandate of the Constitution that it should have been by a five-judge bench," his counsel Wills Matthews said.

"The warrant of appointment of Thomas was cancelled only on the basis of the said judgement. When the legality and the validity of the judgement in itself is disputed it is our humble view that only after reaching conclusion on the legality and validity of the judgement, the respondent (President) should go ahead with the appointment of new CVC," he said.

The Supreme Court had on March 3 quashed the appointment of Thomas as CVC, as a chargesheet was pending against him in a corruption case in Kerala. Thomas was appointed as CVC in September 2010.

The counsel for Thomas cited Article 145 (3) of the Constitution saying those issues connected with the interpretation of the Constitution have to be decided by a minimum five-judge bench.

"The President of India has also acted on the basis of the said judgment. That is why we sent our reference to her," Matthews said.

PTI

First Published: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 11:35

Comments

Sibi - Bangalore
he may think that he can get the pamolin case cancelled with the help of congress government in kerala. after that again he can try for the cvc post again. if he is not corrupt, he should prove it first rather than hanging to cvc post
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Dinesh - USA
weren`t p chidambaram and mammohan under impression that tainted officials and bureaucrats can be tamed to run monkey business?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Hindu Voice - Mumbai
what does he gain by stopping the appointment of a new cvc? is it not pure arrogance?
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Ankit - gurgaon
cheap publicity among his folks. what he looses, but definitely doesn`t care about, is his already worsened image
Reply

Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Ankit - Gurgaon
this a h will do anything to get back as cvc as its not only in his personal interest but also the interest of the religios entities backing him.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI-(INDIA)
our main big profession seems to be ......looting.... corruption,,,,,,scams.....probe........deleting evidence.......and finally no punishment or nominal punishment to the small fish.................big fish escaped.................
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
debashis bhattacharya - uae
in india this is all juglari of law so that there are many loose end and justise is not done even denied. what useless juditial system we have? if supreme court judge has a good intention then also he has to think may be 10 times before giving a verdict. this must be changed. all cases must be settled with in a time frame. take example of hadly case in usa. the judgement came with in few months( 4 months) in such a sensitive and importent case. usa really a proper demicracy. what we have in india is a democracy which has become defacto dictatorship as no body can do any thing to high burocrate and mp`s . what a system.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Post your Comments

Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Most liked Comments

D.N.MAKHIJA - DELHI-(INDIA)
our main big profession seems to be ......looting.... corruption,,,,,,scams.....probe........deleting evidence.......and finally no punishment or nominal punishment to the small fish.................big fish escaped.................



Ankit - Gurgaon
this a h will do anything to get back as cvc as its not only in his personal interest but also the interest of the religios entities backing him.



Ankit - gurgaon
cheap publicity among his folks. what he looses, but definitely doesn`t care about, is his already worsened image