Nepal Prez endorses anti-money laundering ordinances
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Friday, May 24, 2013 
Search
South Asia

Nepal Prez endorses anti-money laundering ordinances

Last Updated: Monday, June 18, 2012, 20:38     A- A A+
Comments 2
Kathmandu: Nepal, which risked being blacklisted for failing to initiate steps to check money laundering, on Monday approved two ordinances to endorse global efforts to tackle the menace.

Nepalese President Ram Baran Yadav endorsed two ordinances on Mutual Legal Assistance Bill and Extradition Treaty, both related to anti-money laundering.

The government had forwarded two Bills to the President for endorsement as the Parliament was dissolved on May 27 after it failed to draft a new Constitution.

The bills were forwarded to the President amid risk of Nepal being blacklisted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global anti-money laundering body.

The President office in a statement said that the President issued those bills through ordinance taking into account the national interests and commitment Nepal has expressed to the international community.

FATF has been warning Nepal over possible blacklisting if the country failed to endorse three bills on anti-money laundering Mutual Legal Assistance, Extradition Treaty and Organised Crime at the earliest.

However, the Cabinet failed to forward another ordinance on Organised Crime due to differences among political parties.

The opposition parties have warned the caretaker government not to take any important decision.

PTI

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Monday, June 18, 2012, 20:38

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Dipendra Ghimire - Kathmandu
Constituent Assembly failed to promulgate a new constitution of nepal and the tenure of CA ended by 27 may 2012. The government of Dr Baburam Bhattarai has being converted in to working government with out utive power. One thing we all have to understand that by the point of view of jurisprudent , no state will be vacant , there is no imagination of the vacant of the government. so, government should have maintain the law and order of the country. these two ordinance came in the consequences of this time.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Dirgha Raj Prasai - Kathmandu,Nepal
The term of the Constituent Assembly (CA) ended at midnight of 27 May, 2012. The CA failed to promulgate a constitution consequently ending the relevance of Baburam Bhattarai’s cabinet, presidential apparatus and all the elemets formed under the interim constitution, 2006. The President and the Prime Minister, without constitutional mandate, are legally debarred from exercising any constitutional right.The interim constitution 2006 that was introduced for the management of CA holds no meaning after the dissolution of CA. The interim constitution 2006 was automatically dissolved as the new constitution was not drafted in time. The 1990 constitution has automatically revived. The state must immediately take action against whosoever desire to start a debate intent on keeping the people in illusion like in the time of yesterdays. So, the presedent has no constitutional rights toapprove two ordinances. Thank you Dirgha Raj Prasai
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Top News



latest

South Asia

First Saudi woman climbs Everest, makes history


Read More »