Pokhran II tests not fully successful: DRDO scientist
Zeenews
       English        
 Follow Me on Pinterest Google Plus Ditto RSS Mail to us Mail to us
Saturday, May 25, 2013 
Search
Nation

Pokhran II tests not fully successful: DRDO scientist

Last Updated: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 11:27     A- A A+
Comments 2
Pokhran II tests not fully successful: DRDO scientist Zeenews Bureau

New Delhi: In a startling revelation that questions country’s nuclear prowess, a senior DRDO scientist associated with Pokhran II nuclear tests has claimed that the tests were only partially successful and the results much below expectations.

According to a report published in English daily on Thursday, K Santhanam, senior scientist and DRDO representative at Pokhran II, has blown the lid off the claims by India about the success of the nuclear tests.

Santham has also stressed that the country needs to conduct more nuclear tests to consolidate its position and improve its knowledge of nuclear weapon programme before joining Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

The report quotes Santhanam, who was director for 1998 test site preparations, as saying that the yield for the thermonuclear test or hydrogen bomb in popular usage was much lower than what was claimed.

As per him the yield of Pokharan II tests can only be classified as a “fizzle” rather than big bang.

In nuclear terminology, a test is classified as a fizzle when the yield is below expectation.

This revelation is likely to stir up a hornet’s nest by giving fresh credence to the earlier debates in the foreign media over the success of India’s nuclear tests.

“Based upon the seismic measurements and expert opinion from world over, it is clear that the yield in the thermonuclear device test was much lower than what was claimed. I think it is well documented and that is why I assert that India should not rush into signing the CTBT,'' Santhanam was quoted as saying.

Soon after the tests, the Indian authorities claimed that Pokhran II test was a huge success as it yielded 45 kilotons (KT). However, this was contradicted by the western experts who said that it was not more than 20 KT.

Meanwhile, the Defence Ministry has reacted sharply to Santhanam’s revelation by saying that India has a meaningful nuclear deterrent, TV reports claimed.

For Zee News’s Updates, follow us on Twitter , Facebook, Google+, Pinterest

First Published: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 11:27

Post your Comments

Name:
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

Comments

Chanakya -
When even Ministry of Defence is in the thinking that India has a meaningful nuclear deterrent (while reports claim and acclaimed scientists think not), than Santhanam speaking out is the best thing he could have possibly done for the security of India. Indeed India must do more tests to make sure they have a tested working hydrogen bomb. So, no way government can sign the test ban treaty without having done some more tests!! UPA must not play with the security of the Nation. This will be an unforgivable deed.
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 
Dr. V.L.Lokre - Pune
This work is classified and most secret. How Dr. K. Santhanan, Senior DRDO Scientist, who was associated with this project, is permitted to speak about in public? A strict disciplinary action should be taken immediately. Is he making such irresponsible statements to gain some publicity or is he guided by some body to do it in the present circumstances. Why he was silent for over 11 years when the trials were conducted in 1998? Many questions arise due to this debatable revelation. Dr. V.L.Lokre Retd. DRDO Scientist August 27, 2009
Reply



Post your Comments

X
Name
Place :
Email :
Comments :
 

View all Comments   

Most liked Comments

Dr. V.L.Lokre - Pune
This work is classified and most secret. How Dr. K. Santhanan, Senior DRDO Scientist, who was associated with this project, is permitted to speak about in public? A strict disciplinary action should be taken immediately. Is he making such irresponsible statements to gain some publicity or is he guided by some body to do it in the present circumstances. Why he was silent for over 11 years when the trials were conducted in 1998? Many questions arise due to this debatable revelation. Dr. V.L.Lokre Retd. DRDO Scientist August 27, 2009



Top News



latest