Washington: No terrestrial, or Earth-like planets have yet been confirmed orbiting white or brown dwarfs, but a new research suggests such planets if exist will prove poor candidates for life.
White dwarves are the hot cores of dead stars and brown dwarfs are failed stars, objects not massive enough to start nuclear burning as the sun does.
In theory, both can be bright enough to theoretically support a habitable zone — that swath of space just right for an orbiting planet's surface water to be in liquid form, thus giving life a chance.
The inner edge of that just-right zone is where a planet starts to become a runaway greenhouse, such as Venus. That heating phenomenon removes the planet's surface water and all chance of life — of habitability — is forever lost.
White and brown dwarfs share a common characteristic that sets them apart from normal stars like the sun: They slowly cool and become less luminous over time. And as they cool, their habitable zones gradually shrink inward. Thus, a planet that is found in the center of the habitable zone today must previously have spent time near the zone's deadly inner edge.
Because of their past, such planet would “face a difficult path to habitability,” even if they're discovered right in that habitable zone, said Rory Barnes of the University of Washington, who conducted the new study with Rene Heller of Germany's Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam.
Call it a sort of cosmic background check, revealing that the worlds probably lost the means to host life long before they became habitable zone residents.
“These planets, if we find them today in a current habitable zone, previously had to have gone through a phase which sterilized them forever,” Barnes said.
Heller added, “So, even if they are located in the habitable zone today, they are dead.”
A paper describing their study was published in November in the journal Astrobiology.
First Published: Wednesday, November 21, 2012, 16:56